Trial reportNeurourology and urodynamics2021
A prospective, multicenter, international study to explore the effect of three different amplitude settings in female subjects with urinary urge incontinence receiving interstim therapy.
Trial report in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sacral Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract, Bowel and Sexual Dysfunction in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Trial.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2025Trial
- A prospective, multicenter, international study to explore the effect of three different amplitude settings in female subjects with urinary urge incontinence receiving interstim therapy.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2021Trial
- Article
- Article
- Rationale and design of an implant procedure and pivotal study to evaluate safety and effectiveness of Medtronic's tibial neuromodulation device.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of sub-sensory amplitude settings of sacral neuromodulation therapy on overactive bladder symptoms in subjects with urinary urge incontinence.
methodsSubjects who qualified for a neurostimulator device implant were randomized to one of three amplitude settings (50% of sensory threshold [ST], 80% of ST, and ST). Subjects completed urinary voiding diaries (3-day), International consultation on incontinence modular questionnaire-overactive bladder symptoms quality of life questionnaire, and patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) to assess change in voiding symptoms and quality of life (QoL) from baseline through 12 weeks.
resultsForty-eight subjects had a successful test stimulation, 46 were implanted with a neurostimulator device and 43 completed the 12-week follow-up visit. The change from baseline to 12 weeks is -3.0 urinary incontinence (UI) episodes/day (95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.4 to -1.7) for the 50% of sensory threshold group, -2.9 UI episodes/day (95% CI: -4.7 to -1.2) for 80% of sensory threshold group, and -3.6 UI episodes/day (95% CI: -5.2 to -1.9) for the sensory threshold group. In each randomized group, improvements were observed in health-related QoL, its subscales, and symptom interference. Subjects across all three randomization groups reported on the PGI-I that their bladder condition was better at 12 weeks compared to before they were treated with InterStim therapy.
conclusionThese findings provide insights into possible advancements in the postimplantation phase of therapy with potential for improved patient comfort and increased device longevity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.