Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33645840›Full record

ArticleAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2021

Historical and contemporary views on cholera transmission: are we repeating past discussions? Can lessons learned from cholera be applied to COVID-19?

Peter Kjaer Mackie Jensen, Stephen Lawrence Grant, Mads Linnet Perner, Zenat Zebin Hossain, Jannatul Ferdous, Rebeca Sultana, Sara Almeida, Matthew Phelps, Anowara Begum

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Detection of toxigenicIDCases · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peter Kjaer Mackie JensenCopenhagen Center for Disaster Research, Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stephen Lawrence GrantCopenhagen Center for Disaster Research, Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mads Linnet PernerCopenhagen Center for Disaster Research, Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Zenat Zebin HossainCopenhagen Center for Disaster Research, Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jannatul FerdousCopenhagen Center for Disaster Research, Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rebeca SultanaCopenhagen Center for Disaster Research, Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sara AlmeidaCopenhagen Center for Disaster Research, Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Matthew PhelpsThe Danish Heart Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anowara BegumDepartment of Microbiology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholera, a devastating diarrheal disease that caused several global pandemics in the last centuries, may share some similarities with the new COVID-19. Cholera has affected many populations in history and still remains a significant burden in developing countries. The main transmission route was thought to be predominantly through contaminated drinking water. However, revisiting the historical data collected during the Copenhagen 1853 cholera outbreak allowed us to re-evaluate the role of drinking-water transmission in a city-wide outbreak and reconsider some critical transmission routes, which have been neglected since the time of John Snow. Recent empirical and cohort data from Bangladesh also strengthened the dynamic potentiality of other transmission routes (food, fomite, fish, flies) for transmitting cholera. Analyzing this particular nature of the cholera disease transmission, this paper will describe how the pattern of transmission routes are similar to COVID-19 and how the method of revisiting old data can be used for further exploration of new and known diseases.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2BangladeshCholeraCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksDrinking WaterFecesHistory, 19th CenturyHumansDrinking WaterBangladeshCholera transmissionCOVID-19drinking waterF-diagramFecal-oral transmissionpandemic

Identifiers

PMID33645840
PMCPMC8014510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.