Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33645838›Full record

ReviewAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2021

Autopsies in pandemics - a perspective on barriers and benefits. Is it time for a revival?

Apameh Khatam-Lashgari, Mikkel Jon Henningsen, Kristine Boisen Olsen, Christina Jacobsen, Jane Preuss Hasselby, Bonnie Colville-Ebeling, Jytte Banner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on forensic pathology services in Limpopo province, South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Autopsies in pandemics - a perspective on barriers and benefits. Is it time for a revival?APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Apameh Khatam-LashgariDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel Jon HenningsenDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristine Boisen OlsenDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christina JacobsenDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jane Preuss HasselbyDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital of Copenhagen (Rigshospitalet), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bonnie Colville-EbelingDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital of Copenhagen (Rigshospitalet), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jytte BannerDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza virus and coronavirus pandemics regularly sweep the globe, at great cost of health and economy. Our aim was to conduct a PubMed search for autopsy studies on influenza and coronavirus to investigate the contribution of autopsies during pandemics, focussing on autopsy methods and procedures and the role of autopsy findings in pandemics. The retrieved autopsy studies generally relied on microscopy, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), immunostaining and electron microscopy. Most were small and reported on lung effects, including diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), pneumonia and tracheobronchitis. Antibiotic therapy has diminished a role for bacterial pneumonia, whereas obesity is an emerging risk factor. Autopsy studies have provided new insights into coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatments like anti-coagulative therapy. Unfortunately, autopsies during pandemics are hampered by lack of guidelines, facilities and expertise for handling potentially infectious corpses and by widely varying recommendations for personal protective equipment and procedures. The Department of Forensic Pathology, at the Forensic Institute, at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark has, in collaboration with the Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, initiated a prospective observational study on COVID-19-related deaths encompassing postmortem imaging, standardized autopsy procedures/reporting and extensive tissue sampling for histological, chemical, microbiological and genetic analysis. The study involves a diverse array of research groups at the University of Copenhagen, and the clinical field.

Indexed as

AutopsySARS-CoV-2Coronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansInfluenza, HumanPandemicsSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeAutopsyCOVID-19infectious diseaseinfluenzapandemic

Identifiers

PMID33645838
PMCPMC8013917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.