Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33645814›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021

Imperfect spoiling in variable flip angle T

Nadège Corbin, Martina F Callaghan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Incomplete Spoiling Correction for 3DMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Sensitivity of LiteratureNMR in biomedicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Model-based multi-parameter mapping.Medical image analysis · 2021
    Article
  13. Imperfect spoiling in variable flip angle TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nadège CorbinWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3296-4544
Martina F CallaghanWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0374-1659

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203147/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe variable flip angle (VFA) approach to T

methodsThe impact of the spoiling regime was investigated through numerical simulations, phantom and invivo experiments.

resultsThe predicted dependence of

conclusionError in

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainPhantoms, ImagingRadio WavesReproducibility of Results7TEPGimperfect spoilingMPMT1 mappingVFA

Identifiers

PMID33645814
PMCPMC8436769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.