Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33645587›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2021

Whole-Mount Staining, Visualization, and Analysis of Fungiform, Circumvallate, and Palate Taste Buds.

Lisa C Ohman, Robin F Krimm

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Taste arbor structural variability analyzed across taste regions.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa C OhmanAnatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville; lcohma01@louisville.edu.
Robin F KrimmAnatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville.
University of Louisville · US

Funding

Regulation of taste neuron morphology and functionR01DC007176 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI Robin Frances Krimm · 2005 to 2026
$8.1M
Taste neuron connectivity and branching revealed by sparse cell genetic labelingR21DC014857 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI KRIMM, ROBIN FRANCES · 2015 to 2016
$400k
The role of BDNF in taste receptor cell innervationR21DC005252 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI KRIMM, ROBIN FRANCES · 2001 to 2003
$285k
Connectivity of periperal taste neuronsF31DC017660 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI OHMAN, LISA C · 2018 to 2021
$103k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC017660NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007176NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC014857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taste buds are collections of taste-transducing cells specialized to detect subsets of chemical stimuli in the oral cavity. These transducing cells communicate with nerve fibers that carry this information to the brain. Because taste-transducing cells continuously die and are replaced throughout adulthood, the taste-bud environment is both complex and dynamic, requiring detailed analyses of its cell types, their locations, and any physical relationships between them. Detailed analyses have been limited by tongue-tissue heterogeneity and density that have significantly reduced antibody permeability. These obstacles require sectioning protocols that result in splitting taste buds across sections so that measurements are only approximated, and cell relationships are lost. To overcome these challenges, the methods described herein involve collecting, imaging, and analyzing whole taste buds and individual terminal arbors from three taste regions: fungiform papillae, circumvallate papillae, and the palate. Collecting whole taste buds reduces bias and technical variability and can be used to report absolute numbers for features including taste-bud volume, total taste-bud innervation, transducing-cell counts, and the morphology of individual terminal arbors. To demonstrate the advantages of this method, this paper provides comparisons of taste bud and innervation volumes between fungiform and circumvallate taste buds using a general taste-bud marker and a label for all taste fibers. A workflow for the use of sparse-cell genetic labeling of taste neurons (with labeled subsets of taste-transducing cells) is also provided. This workflow analyzes the structures of individual taste-nerve arbors, cell type numbers, and the physical relationships between cells using image analysis software. Together, these workflows provide a novel approach for tissue preparation and analysis of both whole taste buds and the complete morphology of their innervating arbors.

Indexed as

Staining and LabelingAnimalsCell CountDissectionImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImmunohistochemistryMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalNeuronsPalateTaste Buds

Identifiers

PMID33645587
PMCPMC8785251
OpenAlexW3132743420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.