ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2021
Qualitative exploration of factors influencing the plan selection process by Medicare beneficiaries.
Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging role of GLP-1 mono, dual, and triple agonists in the management of MASH-related fibrosis.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Review
- Increasing the Probability of Comparing Between Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage.Health literacy research and practice · 2026Article
- Medicare Plan Switching and Hospice Care Among Decedents With Advanced Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- What is Medicare Advantage and Why is it the Most Important Contemporary Policy Affecting Kidney Disease?American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2026Review
- Addressing complexity: The development and pilot testing of a user-friendly Medicare Part D patient decision aid tool.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025Article
- Therapeutic horizons in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Review
- Growth Of Chronic Condition Special Needs Plans Among Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries, 2011-24.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.