ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2021
In Vivo Printing of Nanoenabled Scaffolds for the Treatment of Skeletal Muscle Injuries.
Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in GelMA hydrogel transplantation for musculoskeletal disorders and related disease treatment.Theranostics · 2023Pooled it
- Aptamer-Based Delivery Systems for VEGF and NGF Modulation in Ocular Therapies.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Coupling intraoperative bioprinting and surgical micropuncture for synergistic scaffold vascularization.Biomaterials · 2026Article
- Current Methodologies for Inducing Aligned Myofibers in Tissue Constructs for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Regeneration.Advances in wound care · 2025Review
- Bridging immune-neurovascular crosstalk via the immunomodulatory microspheres for promoting neural repair.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Extrusion-Based Printing of Myoblast-Loaded Fibrin Microthreads to Induce Myogenesis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Bioactive peptides and proteins for tissue repair: microenvironment modulation, rational delivery, and clinical potential.Military Medical Research · 2024Review
- A robotic arm with open-source reconstructive workflow forApplied physics reviews · 2024Article
- Arthroscopic device with bendable tip for the controlled extrusion of hydrogels on cartilage defects.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Conformal 3D Printing Algorithm for Surfaces and Its In Situ Repair Applications.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Intelligent In situ Printing of Multimaterial Bioinks for First-Aid Wound Care Guided by Eye-In-Hand Robot Technology.Advanced materials technologies · 2024Article
- Current Biomedical Applications of 3D-Printed Hydrogels.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Synergistic coupling between 3D bioprinting and vascularization strategies.Biofabrication · 2023Review
- Rhabdomyosarcoma: Current Therapy, Challenges, and Future Approaches to Treatment Strategies.Cancers · 2023Review
- Nano-biomaterials and advanced fabrication techniques for engineering skeletal muscle tissue constructs in regenerative medicine.Nano convergence · 2023Review
- Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) Hydrogel Scaffolds: Predicting Physical Properties Using an Experimental Design Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Review
- Aerobic exercise and scaffolds with hierarchical porosity synergistically promote functional recovery post volumetric muscle loss.Biomaterials · 2023Article
- Approximating scaffold printability utilizing computational methods.Biofabrication · 2023Article
- Hyaluronic acid methacrylate/laponite hydrogel loaded with BMP4 and maintaining its bioactivity for scar-free wound healing.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Extremity skeletal muscle injuries result in substantial disability. Current treatments fail to recoup muscle function, but properly designed and implemented tissue engineering and regenerative medicine techniques can overcome this challenge. In this study, a nanoengineered, growth factor-eluting bioink that utilizes Laponite nanoclay for the controlled release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and a GelMA hydrogel for a supportive and adhesive scaffold that can be crosslinked in vivo is presented. The bioink is delivered with a partially automated handheld printer for the in vivo formation of an adhesive and 3D scaffold. The effect of the controlled delivery of VEGF alone or paired with adhesive, supportive, and fibrilar architecture has not been studied in volumetric muscle loss (VML) injuries. Upon direct in vivo printing, the constructs are adherent to skeletal muscle and sustained release of VEGF. The in vivo printing of muscle ink in a murine model of VML injury promotes functional muscle recovery, reduced fibrosis, and increased anabolic response compared to untreated mice. The in vivo construction of a therapeutic-eluting 3D scaffold paves the way for the immediate treatment of a variety of soft tissue traumas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.