Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33644760›Full record

ReviewSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2020

The evolving view of replay and its functions in wake and sleep.

Graham Findlay, Giulio Tononi, Chiara Cirelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Multi-region processing during sleep for memory and cognition.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. How our understanding of memory replay evolves.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Imagination as a fundamental function of the hippocampus.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Multiple traces and altered signal-to-noise in systems consolidation: Evidence from the 7T fMRI Natural Scenes Dataset.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Graham FindlayDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Giulio TononiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Chiara CirelliDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2563-677X

Funding

Electron Microscopy Core CP01NS083514 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CIRELLI, CHIARA · 2014 to 2018
$7.7M
NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS083514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term hippocampal replay originally referred to the temporally compressed reinstantiation, during rest, of sequential neural activity observed during prior active wake. Since its description in the 1990s, hippocampal replay has often been viewed as the key mechanism by which a memory trace is repeatedly rehearsed at high speeds during sleep and gradually transferred to neocortical circuits. However, the methods used to measure the occurrence of replay remain debated, and it is now clear that the underlying neural events are considerably more complicated than the traditional narratives had suggested. "Replay-like" activity happens during wake, can play out in reverse order, may represent trajectories never taken by the animal, and may have additional functions beyond memory consolidation, from learning values and solving the problem of credit assignment to decision-making and planning. Still, we know little about the role of replay in cognition, and to what extent it differs between wake and sleep. This may soon change, however, because decades-long efforts to explain replay in terms of reinforcement learning (RL) have started to yield testable predictions and possible explanations for a diverse set of observations. Here, we (1) survey the diverse features of replay, focusing especially on the latest findings; (2) discuss recent attempts at unifying disparate experimental results and putatively different cognitive functions under the banner of RL; (3) discuss methodological issues and theoretical biases that impede progress or may warrant a partial revaluation of the current literature, and finally; (4) highlight areas of considerable uncertainty and promising avenues of inquiry.

Indexed as

cognitive mapdecision-makinghippocampusmemory consolidationplanningreactivationrecallreinforcement learningreplaysharp-wave ripples

Identifiers

PMID33644760
PMCPMC7898724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.