Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33644745›Full record

ArticleContraception: X2021

Clinical availability of the copper IUD in rural versus urban settings: A simulated patient study.

Kristen Lilja, Jennifer Chin, Lyndsey S Benson, Sofia Infante, Elizabeth Micks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception: X, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Reproductive Health Services in Abortion-Providing Clinics: A Scoping Review of Provision and Policy Contexts.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristen LiljaSalt Lake Regional Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Jennifer ChinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Lyndsey S BensonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Sofia InfanteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Creighton University Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Elizabeth MicksDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the proportion of Washington state clinics that offer the copper IUD in rural vs urban settings. STUDY

designWe employed a simulated patient model to survey clinics in the Human Health Resources and Services Administration 340B database to primarily assess the availability of the copper IUD.

resultsWe successfully surveyed 194/212 (92%) clinics. More urban than rural clinics reported copper IUD availability (76/97 [78%] vs 49/97 [51%];

conclusionsRural clinics are less likely than urban clinics to have the copper IUD available. IMPLICATIONS: The frequency of unintended pregnancies is high in the United States. We should focus our attention on decreasing barriers to the copper IUD as a long-acting reversible contraceptive, particularly for women living in rural settings.

Indexed as

AccessCopper IUDEmergency contraceptionRural

Identifiers

PMID33644745
PMCPMC7895703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.