Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33644715›Full record

ArticleiScience2021

Draft genome sequence of the Antarctic green alga

Xi Zhang, Marina Cvetkovska, Rachael Morgan-Kiss, Norman P A Hüner, David Roy Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. HSDatabase-a database of highly similar duplicate genes from plants, animals, and algae.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  13. Retrotransposition facilitated the establishment of a primary plastid in the thecate amoebaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The Antarctic MossFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xi ZhangDepartment of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada.
Marina CvetkovskaDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
Rachael Morgan-KissDepartment of Microbiology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.
Norman P A HünerDepartment of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada.
David Roy SmithDepartment of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada.
Western University · CAMiami University · USUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antarctica is home to an assortment of psychrophilic algae, which have evolved various survival strategies for coping with their frigid environments. Here, we explore Antarctic psychrophily by examining the ∼212 Mb draft nuclear genome of the green alga

Indexed as

biological sciencesgenomic analysisgenomicssequence analysis

Identifiers

PMID33644715
PMCPMC7887394
OpenAlexW3122286831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.