ArticleArchives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases2020
The strain and strain rate imaging paradox in echocardiography: overabundant literature in the last two decades but still uncertain clinical utility in an individual case.
Article in Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Modified Haller Index to a Novel Patented Anatomical Measurement Device: Engineering Development, Validation, and Clinical Applications of Non-Invasive Thoracic Morphometry.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biventricular Systolic Function and Myocardial Deformation in Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking Studies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Unmasking Risk in Mitral Regurgitation: Prognostic Value of Exercise Stress Echocardiography-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Sex-Related Differences in Myocardial Deformation and Systolic Function in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Global Longitudinal Strain and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Multimodality imaging approach in cardiac asymptomatic subjects with systemic sclerosis followed at a tertiary center.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Longitudinal strain in left ventricular non-compaction: insights derived from two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging strain.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Does Preliminary Chest Shape Assessment Improve the Prognostic Risk Stratification of Symptomatic Individuals with Primary Mitral Regurgitation? A Narrative Review of Traditional and Innovative Prognostic Indicators.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Echocardiographic Assessment of Biventricular Mechanics in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Ratio of early transmitral inflow velocity to early diastolic strain rate predicts atrial fibrillation following acute myocardial infarction.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Changes in left atrial function following two regimens of combined exercise training in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: a pilot study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Reliability of left ventricular hemodynamic forces derived from feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance.PloS one · 2024Article
- Clinical and Translational Imaging and Sensing of Diabetic Microangiopathy: A Narrative Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- Strain Echocardiography in Acute COVID-19 and Post-COVID Syndrome: More than Just a Snapshot.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Molecular Approaches and Echocardiographic Deformation Imaging in Detecting Myocardial Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- High salt intake damages myocardial viability and induces cardiac remodelingFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Almost two decades ago strain and strain rate imaging were proposed as a new, potentially more sensitive modality for quantifying both regional and global myocardial function. Until now, however, strain and strain rate imaging have been slow to be incorporated into everyday clinical practice. More recently, two dimensional strain has been claimed as of greater clinical utility, given that it is angle independent, with improved feasibility and reproducibility as compared to tissue Doppler strain. Nevertheless, speckle tracking strain is reliant on 2D image quality and frame rates. Three dimensional speckle tracking could eliminate the problem of through-plane motion inherent in 2D imaging, but 3D strain is currently limited by low frame rates. Another limitation of strain imaging is that the results are dependent on the ultrasound machine on which analyses are performed, with variability in measurements between different vendors. Despite the diagnostic and prognostic advantages of 2D strain, there is a lack of specific therapeutic interventions based on strain and a paucity of long-term large-scale randomized trial evidence on cardiovascular outcomes. After overabundant literature the same definition of normal cut-off values is controversial and not univocal. Further studies are needed, involving both manufacturers and medical professionals, on the additive contribution, possibly different case by case, of interfering and artifactual factors, aside from myocardial function per se. These artifactual determinants and motion artifacts components could be dominant in individual cases and should always be taken into account in the clinical decision making process in a single case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.