ArticleHeliyon2021
State of the art of the management of medical and biological laboratory solid wastes in Togo.
Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mainstreaming of biomedical waste management: Best practices for clinical laboratories in Africa.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biomedical analysis laboratory is a structure intended to carry out biological, immuno-serological, biochemical, hematological or other examinations of substances of human origin to provide information useful for the diagnosis, management, prevention or treatment of diseases. These laboratories produce solid and liquid biomedical waste (BMW) that constitutes a serious health problem for humans and their environment. Temain goal of this study is to assess the management of solid BMW produced by biomedical laboratories in Togo. It is a descriptive, exploratory and transverse study that took place from March 5 to July 5, 2018. Through a systematic random sampling 82 public and private biomedical analysis, laboratories were selected and submitted to a questionnaire. Direct observation and an interview were made with the managers of these laboratories to assess the state of BMW management. The assessment of BMW management of the prospected centers showed that among the 67.1% of public centers and 32.9% of private centers present in the study sample, only 26.3% present all laboratory units and together in 87.8% of cases. Males predominate in these facilities (85.3%) with an average age of 37.07 ± 7.34 years and work experience of 10.24 ± 5.81 years. While in 67.0% of the cases, the location of waste storage is available, only 18.3% of these locations meet international requirements. Incinerators were available in 72.0%. Plastic pedal/balance garbage cans were the most commonly used tools for collection in 32.9% of the facilities. Black bags are used 82.9% for collection. Waste generation is significant with 13.4% of the laboratories producing more than 8 kg/d. Gloves were available and taps in sufficient number in the laboratories. The most common health problems reported were respiratory disorders (32.9%) followed by gastrointestinal disorders (17.1%). BMW is in most cases (18.3%) disposed of in public dumps, while 72% of producers have received training on BMW management. The problem of BMW management remains a concern in health facilities in Togo. Safe disposal of BMW is therefore necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.