Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33644413›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2020

Public involvement and engagement in primary and emergency care research: the story from PRIME Centre Wales.

Bridie Angela Evans, John Gallanders, Lesley Griffiths, Robert Harris-Mayes, Mari James, Sian Jones, Natalie Joseph-Williams, Mary Nettle, Martin Rolph, Helen Snooks and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Implementing public involvement throughout the research process-Experience and learning from the GPs in EDs study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bridie Angela EvansSwansea University Medical School, ILS 2, Singleton Campus, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
John GallandersSUPER, c/o Swansea University Medical School ILS 2, Singleton Campus Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Lesley GriffithsSUPER, c/o Swansea University Medical School ILS 2, Singleton Campus Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Robert Harris-MayesSUPER, c/o Swansea University Medical School ILS 2, Singleton Campus Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Mari JamesSUPER, c/o Swansea University Medical School ILS 2, Singleton Campus Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Sian JonesSUPER, c/o Swansea University Medical School ILS 2, Singleton Campus Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Natalie Joseph-WilliamsDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, CF10 3AT, UK.
Mary NettleSUPER, c/o Swansea University Medical School ILS 2, Singleton Campus Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Martin RolphSUPER, c/o Swansea University Medical School ILS 2, Singleton Campus Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Helen SnooksSwansea University Medical School, ILS 2, Singleton Campus, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Carolyn WallaceFaculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, CF37 1DL, UK.
Adrian EdwardsDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, CF10 3AT, UK.
SUPER group and PRIME Centre Wales
Swansea University · GBCardiff University · GBUniversity of South Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolicy throughout the United Kingdom promotes involvement of patients and public members in research to benefit patient care and health outcomes. PRIME Centre Wales is a national research centre, developing and coordinating research about primary and emergency care which forms 90% of health service encounters. In this paper, we describe our approach to public involvement and engagement in PRIME Centre Wales (hereafter called PRIME), in particular: how this approach has developed; ways in which public members contribute to PRIME activity; the strengths and limitations of our approach, challenges and future opportunities. PRIME ensures work is relevant to service users, carers, the public and policy makers by incorporating comprehensive patient and public involvement in every phase of our work. APPROACH: PRIME has policies and processes to enable and promote successful public involvement and engagement across research activities. This ensures public perspectives and patient experiences are integrated throughout research development, implementation and dissemination and in managing and delivering PRIME strategy over a 10 year timescale. A public/patient group called SUPER is a key resource providing wide-ranging perspectives via email and face-to-face discussion. We collect information on processes and experiences to assess value and impact, to guide ongoing involvement and engagement. A funded post provides leadership and support to staff and to public/patient contributors to facilitate collaborations. DISCUSSION: A stable, well-resourced structure has provided the timescales to build strong relationships and embed diverse approaches to public involvement and engagement within PRIME. Researchers and public contributors have committed to collaborations, developed knowledge and skills and sustained relationships. Effective approaches incorporate values and actions which, when operating together, strengthen processes and outcomes of public involvement and engagement.

conclusionSupportive context, motivation and time are necessary to foster values and practices that enable effective public involvement and engagement. PRIME has embedded public involvement and engagement across research activities and structures. Central is the public/patient group SUPER offering experience-based expertise to add value to the research cycle. This innovative model, aligned with best practice, enhances relevance and quality of primary and emergency care research to benefit patients and the general population.

Indexed as

consumer involvementemergency care researchprimary care researchpublic engagementpublic involvement

Identifiers

PMID33644413
PMCPMC7894248
OpenAlexW3090321636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.