Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33644260›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on computational imaging2020

Multi-Scale Learned Iterative Reconstruction.

Andreas Hauptmann, Jonas Adler, Simon Arridge, Ozan Öktem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on computational imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. On Learned Operator Correction in Inverse Problems.SIAM journal on imaging sciences · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andreas Hauptmann *Research Unit of Mathematical Sciences; University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland and with the Department of Computer Science; University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jonas Adler *Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden and KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockolm, Sweden. He is currently with DeepMind, London, UK.
Simon ArridgeDepartment of Computer Science; University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ozan ÖktemDepartment of Mathematics, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

British Heart Foundation NH/18/1/33511Wellcome Trust 101957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Model-based learned iterative reconstruction methods have recently been shown to outperform classical reconstruction algorithms. Applicability of these methods to large scale inverse problems is however limited by the available memory for training and extensive training times, the latter due to computationally expensive forward models. As a possible solution to these restrictions we propose a multi-scale learned iterative reconstruction scheme that computes iterates on discretisations of increasing resolution. This procedure does not only reduce memory requirements, it also considerably speeds up reconstruction and training times, but most importantly is scalable to large scale inverse problems with non-trivial forward operators, such as those that arise in many 3D tomographic applications. In particular, we propose a hybrid network that combines the multiscale iterative approach with a particularly expressive network architecture which in combination exhibits excellent scalability in 3D. Applicability of the algorithm is demonstrated for 3D cone beam computed tomography from real measurement data of an organic phantom. Additionally, we examine scalability and reconstruction quality in comparison to established learned reconstruction methods in two dimensions for low dose computed tomography on human phantoms.

Indexed as

cone beam computed tomographydeep learninginverse problemsiterative reconstructionModel-based learning

Identifiers

PMID33644260
PMCPMC7116830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.