Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33644044›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2021

Prediction of Lymph-Node Metastasis in Cancers Using Differentially Expressed mRNA and Non-coding RNA Signatures.

Shihua Zhang, Cheng Zhang, Jinke Du, Rui Zhang, Shixiong Yang, Bo Li, Pingping Wang, Wensheng Deng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. MetaCancerDB: a database of site-specific RNA-miRNA correlations in cancer metastasis.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shihua ZhangCollege of Life Science and Health, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Cheng ZhangCollege of Life Science and Health, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jinke DuState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Rui ZhangState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Shixiong YangCentral Laboratory, Xiaogan Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Xiaogan, China.
Bo LiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Pingping WangSchool of Life Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.
Wensheng DengCollege of Life Science and Health, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Wuhan University of Science and Technology · CNAnhui Agricultural University · CNHarbin Institute of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of lymph-node metastasis in cancers is pivotal for the next targeted clinical interventions that allow favorable prognosis for patients. Different molecular profiles (mRNA and non-coding RNAs) have been widely used to establish classifiers for cancer prediction (e.g., tumor origin, cancerous or non-cancerous state, cancer subtype). However, few studies focus on lymphatic metastasis evaluation using these profiles, and the performance of classifiers based on different profiles has also not been compared. Here, differentially expressed mRNAs, miRNAs, and lncRNAs between lymph-node metastatic and non-metastatic groups were identified as molecular signatures to construct classifiers for lymphatic metastasis prediction in different cancers. With this similar feature selection strategy, support vector machine (SVM) classifiers based on different profiles were systematically compared in their prediction performance. For representative cancers (a total of nine types), these classifiers achieved comparative overall accuracies of 81.00% (67.96-92.19%), 81.97% (70.83-95.24%), and 80.78% (69.61-90.00%) on independent mRNA, miRNA, and lncRNA datasets, with a small set of biomarkers (6, 12, and 4 on average). Therefore, our proposed feature selection strategies are economical and efficient to identify biomarkers that aid in developing competitive classifiers for predicting lymph-node metastasis in cancers. A user-friendly webserver was also deployed to help researchers in metastasis risk determination by submitting their expression profiles of different origins.

Indexed as

biomarkerclassifierslymph-node metastasismolecular profileswebserver

Identifiers

PMID33644044
PMCPMC7905047
OpenAlexW3128085031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.