ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020
Dissecting Outcomes: Should Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Be Performed for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma With Sarcomatoid Dedifferentiation?
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- The Evolving Landscape of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2023Review
- Establishment and validation of a nomogram to select patients with metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma suitable for cytoreductive radical nephrectomy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- The Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Sarcomatoid Histology: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is highly contested whether cytoreductive nephrectomy for treating advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with sarcomatoid features (sRCC) benefits overall survival. Patients with sRCC are known to have a poor prognosis, and these tumors have a more aggressive biology than those without sarcomatoid features.
methodsPatients with clear cell RCC or non-clear cell RCC underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy in efforts to improve overall survival (OS). Patients were stratified by presence or absence of histologic sarcomatoid features within tumor samples.
resultsOf 167 patients who underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy, 127 had clear cell RCC, of whom 14 had sarcomatoid features, and 40 had non-clear cell RCC, of whom 13 had sarcomatoid features. Median age of the cohort was 62 years (range, 56.5-69 years). The cohort included 119 male (71.3%) and 48 (28.7%) female patients. Among all patients with advanced RCC, having sRCC had a significantly worse OS after cytoreductive nephrectomy (30 vs 8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 2.88;
conclusionsSarcomatoid features within tumor histology confer significantly poor prognosis. Patients with sRCC, regardless of clear cell vs non-clear cell histology, have significantly shorter OS. Even among patients with 10% or less sarcomatoid features, there was no OS benefit to cytoreductive nephrectomy. Based on our findings, there appears to be a limited to no role of cytoreductive nephrectomy if sRCC is identified on pretreatment biopsy. The role of radiomics and pre-operative biopsies may confer significant benefit in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.