ArticleCureus2021
Investigation of the Effects of Three-Dimensional Modeling Techniques on Degenerative Rotoscoliosis Surgery.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives The present study aimed to compare patients in whom an operation plan was prepared before surgery using the three-dimensional (3D) modeling technology with the application of freehand screws using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scan images. Methods The printings and modelings were established in the Training and Research Center. Of 40 patients, 20 underwent surgery with 3D printing (Group 1) and 20 with the freehand technique (Group 2). The surgeries were performed by the same surgeons. Moreover, 5-mm pedicle screws were located in 122 vertebrae in 20 patients in whom 3D modeling was used and in 124 vertebrae in 20 patients in whom this modeling technique was not used. Results The mean time of screw insertion was 2.9 ± 1.2 minutes in the experimental group and 4.7 ± 2.3 minutes in the control group. While the mean amount of bleeding was 7.4 ± 4.1 ml in the experimental group, it was found to be 39.6 ± 14.2 ml in the control group. When the locations of the screws in the experimental group were evaluated, it was seen that 106 (86.9%) screws were 'excellent' and 16 (13.1%) screws were 'good.' When the placement of 124 pedicle screws in the control group was evaluated, it was found that 100 (80.6%) screws were 'excellent,' 20 (17.8%) screws were 'good,' and two (1.6%) screws were 'poor.' Conclusion The use of the improved 3D technology in the neurosurgery field is advantageous for surgeons, as it decreases the preoperative preparation phase, length of operation, and risk of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.