ArticleCureus2021
High Eosinophil Rates in Patients With Right-to-Left Shunts: An Expected Role, or an Unexpected Risk?
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical research progress on pathogenesis and treatment of Patent Foramen Ovale-associated stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Eosinophils are associated with thromboembolic events. Since eosinophils are eliminated in the pulmonary vasculature, right-to-left shunt (RLS) through patent foramen ovale may increase eosinophils in the peripheral blood. In this report, we evaluated the eosinophils of patients with regard to the presence of RLS and its quantity. Patients and methods In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed the complete blood cell count (CBC) of patients with RLS (n=47) and without RLS (n=31) diagnosed by contrast echocardiography (CE). RLS was identified as mild (5-10 bubbles) and moderate shunt (10-25 bubbles). Results Age and CBC were not significantly different between the groups, with the exception of eosinophils. Patients with RLS had higher eosinophils percentage compared to patients without RLS (3.1 ±1.5 vs. 1.7 ±0.7, p=0.001). Additionally, eosinophils percentage was significantly higher in the mild RLS group (2.4 ±0.9 vs. 1.7 ±0.7, p=0.016) and the moderate RLS group (4.3 ±1.6 vs. 1.7 ±0.7, p=0.001) compared to normal subjects. Also, it was significantly higher in the moderate RLS group compared to the mild group (4.3 ±1.6 vs. 2.4 ±0.9, p=0.001). Conclusions Eosinophils percentage was higher in patients with mild and moderate RLS compared to normal individuals. Moreover, the eosinophil rate was higher in patients with moderate RLS than in patients with mild RLS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.