ArticleCureus2021
The Impact of Door to Diuretic Time in Acute Heart Failure on Hospital Length of Stay and In-Patient Mortality.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Door-to-Diuretic Time and Outcomes in Acute Heart Failure: A Scoping Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025Article
- Time to intravenous diuretic administration in patients hospitalized with heart failure: An observational study.ESC heart failure · 2024Observational
- The Impact of Door to Diuretic Time in Acute Heart Failure on Hospital Length of Stay and In-Patient Mortality.Cureus · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Acute heart failure (AHF) can be life-threatening if not treated promptly and can significantly increase the number of annual emergency department (ED) encounters in the United States. Achieving adequate and prompt euvolemic state in AHF patients using intravenous (IV) diuretics is the cornerstone of treatment, which not only reduces in-hospital stay and mortality but also decreases healthcare expenditures. Surprisingly, the door to diuretic (D2D) time in AHF patients has always been a debatable issue among physicians worldwide, and so far, there are no set guidelines. This study examines a large cohort of AHF patients to determine the association between diuretics use within 90 minutes of ED admission and hospital length of stay (LOS) and patient mortality. Methods Retrospective institutional data of AHF patients receiving IV diuretics following ED admission were extracted from 2016 to 2017. A total of 7,751 patients treated for AHF exacerbation were included, which were further divided into two groups based on the timing of diuretics administration (<90 minutes vs. ≥90 minutes). The primary outcomes were LOS between the two groups and hospital mortality. The standard statistical methodology was used for data analysis. Results A total of 7,751 AHF cases receiving IV diuretics were identified. Almost 1,432 patients (18.5%) received IV diuretics within 90 minutes of ER admission (group 1) while 6,319 patients (81.5%) patients received IV diuretics after 90 minutes (group 2). Furthermore, among group 1 patients, average LOS was noted to be associated with shorter hospitalization (average of 1.423 days less as compared to group 2 patients (confidence interval (CI) =1.02-1.82; p<0.05). Finally, after controlling for other mortality risk factors, patients in group 2 were 1.435 times more likely to have died compared to patients in group 1 (CI=1.03-1.98; p<0.05). Conclusions D2D time in AHF patients has always been a crucial judgmental decision. The current study successfully demonstrated the relation between IV diuretics administration within 90 minutes of ED admission, favorable clinical outcomes, and decreased mortality rates. More adequately powered studies are needed to validate the results of our current study further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.