Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33643547›Full record

ArticleJournal of extracellular vesicles2021

Cross-flow microfiltration for isolation, selective capture and release of liposarcoma extracellular vesicles.

Lucia Casadei, Adarsh Choudhury, Patricia Sarchet, Prashanth Mohana Sundaram, Gonzalo Lopez, Danielle Braggio, Gita Balakirsky, Raphael Pollock, Shaurya Prakash

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Liquid Biopsy: The Challenges of a Revolutionary Approach in Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Engineered exosomes from different sources for cancer-targeted therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucia CasadeiComprehensive Cancer Center The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
Adarsh ChoudhuryDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
Patricia SarchetComprehensive Cancer Center The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
Prashanth Mohana SundaramDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
Gonzalo LopezComprehensive Cancer Center The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
Danielle BraggioComprehensive Cancer Center The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
Gita BalakirskyComprehensive Cancer Center The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
Raphael PollockDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
Shaurya PrakashComprehensive Cancer Center The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer A. Woyach · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Biophysical-based approach for controlling blood vessel structure and functionR01HL141941 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CASTRO, CARLOS E., PRAKASH, SHAURYA · 2018 to 2021
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a resource-efficient approach to fabricate and operate a micro-nanofluidic device that uses cross-flow filtration to isolate and capture liposarcoma derived extracellular vesicles (EVs). The isolated extracellular vesicles were captured using EV-specific protein markers to obtain vesicle enriched media, which was then eluted for further analysis. Therefore, the micro-nanofluidic device integrates the unit operations of size-based separation with CD63 antibody immunoaffinity-based capture of extracellular vesicles in the same device to evaluate EV-cargo content for liposarcoma. The eluted media collected showed ∼76% extracellular vesicle recovery from the liposarcoma cell conditioned media and ∼32% extracellular vesicle recovery from dedifferentiated liposarcoma patient serum when compared against state-of-art extracellular vesicle isolation and subsequent quantification by ultracentrifugation. The results reported here also show a five-fold increase in amount of critical liposarcoma-relevant extracellular vesicle cargo obtained in 30 min presenting a significant advance over existing state-of-art.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCell Line, TumorExtracellular VesiclesFiltrationHumansLiposarcomaNanotechnologyNeoplasms, Adipose TissueUltracentrifugationBiomarkerscross flow filtrationDNAeEVextracellular vesicleslEVliposarcomaMDM2microfluidicsnanofluidicstangential flow separation

Identifiers

PMID33643547
PMCPMC7887429
OpenAlexW3132865162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.