ArticleJournal of children's orthopaedics2021
Myelomeningocele: a new functional classification.
Article in Journal of children's orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early Functional Mobility After Posteromedial Release for Myelodysplastic Clubfoot in Children: Effect of Neurological Level and Quadriceps Function.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Gait in childhood and adulthood in persons with myelomeningocele - a retrospective analysis.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Six-minute walk test reference values in ambulatory children with myelomeningocele.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2026Article
- Analysis of Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition in Lower and Upper Limbs of Spina Bifida Patients Using DXA Scans.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- A global core outcome set for orthopaedic interventions in children with spinal dysraphism : aiming to enhance research quality and patient outcomes.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- Understanding Orthopaedic and Health-related Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients With Myelomeningocele Functional Classification 1 Spina Bifida in Relationship to Supportive Standing.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2025Article
- Tethered cord syndrome in patients with myelomeningocele: Presentation of 3 cases, technical note on re-anchoring without dural opening.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Selective dorsal rhizotomy long-term effects on functional motility in Jordanian children with spastic cerebral palsy.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Thalamic connectivity topography in newborns with spina bifida: association with neurological functional level but not developmental outcome at 2 years.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Influencing Factors on Independent Walking in Children With Lumbosacral Lipomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on a 5-Year Untethering Series.Clinical medicine insights. Pediatrics · 2024Article
- Brazilian Version of the Myelomeningocele Functional Classification (MMFC): Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2023Article
- Motor function outcomes in children with open prenatal repair of Spina Bifida Aperta at 36-month follow-up: The Zurich cohort.Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn myelomeningocele, several classifications have been used. The present manuscript proposes a new functional classification to better assess the prognosis and management of these patients.
methodsThe manual muscle test is what defines the actual group in which the patient should be included. Furthermore, this new classification brings information about the bracing and external supports recommended to each functional level. We also recommend that the patient's Functional Mobility Scale should always be mentioned together with their functional level.
resultsThe four levels in this classification are MMFC1, MMFC2, MMFC3 and MMFC4. The MMFC1 group includes patients with significant muscle weakness. They need to use high braces crossing the hip joint with a walker to achieve some ambulation. The MMFC2 group includes patients who have functional hip flexors, knee extensors and knee flexors. However, the hip abductors are quite weak. These patients usually need to use a walker - or crutches - and Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFOs). The MMFC3 group includes patients with functional hip flexors, knee extensors, knee flexors and hip abductors. However, the ankle plantar flexion function is absent. Most of them are able to walk independently, only using AFOs without any external support. The MMFC4 group includes patients who have preserved function in the entire lower limb musculature. These patients don't need any assistive devices to achieve an adequate ambulation pattern.
conclusionsWe hope that this new classification is a system that is simple to understand, serves as a gait prognosis guide and facilitates communication among healthcare professionals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.