Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33643426›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2021

Critical care scientists: Role, training and future directions.

Natalie Fowler, Raashid Ali, Jonathan Bannard-Smith, Claire Jennings, Stephen Playfor, Michal Pruski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Optimization of critical care pharmacy clinical services: A gap analysis approach.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natalie FowlerManchester Universities NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2310-7938
Raashid AliManchester Universities NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Jonathan Bannard-SmithManchester Universities NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Claire JenningsManchester Universities NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Stephen PlayforManchester Universities NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Michal PruskiManchester Universities NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7582-1418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical care scientists are a little known but increasingly prominent group of professionals, included in both the government-run Modernising Scientific Careers initiative and 2019 Guidelines for the Provision of Intensive Care Services. This article outlines the role of critical care scientists, their training programme and potential future directions for the role. A wider appreciation and acknowledgement of the critical care scientist's role within the multi-disciplinary team will allow critical care units to fully understand the potential benefits that may be brought to patient care and service delivery.

Indexed as

allied health professionsclinical scientistcritical care scientistHealthcare scienceintensive therapy unitITUtechnologist

Identifiers

PMID33643426
PMCPMC7890759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.