Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33643397›Full record

ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2021

[Diagnostic properties of case definitions of suspected COVID-19 in Chile, 2020Características diagnósticas das definições de caso suspeito de COVID-19 no Chile, 2020].

Josefina Aubert, Doris Durán, María José Monsalves, María Francisca Rodríguez, Elena S Rotarou, Jean Gajardo, Tania Alfaro, María Paz Bertoglia, Sergio Muñoz, Cristóbal Cuadrado

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Josefina AubertFacultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastián Santiago Chile Facultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile.
Doris DuránFacultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastián Santiago Chile Facultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile.
María José MonsalvesFacultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastián Santiago Chile Facultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile.
María Francisca RodríguezFacultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastián Santiago Chile Facultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile.
Elena S RotarouFacultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastián Santiago Chile Facultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile.
Jean GajardoFacultad de Ciencias para el Cuidado de la Salud, Universidad San Sebastián Santiago Chile Facultad de Ciencias para el Cuidado de la Salud, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile.
Tania AlfaroPrograma de Epidemiología, Escuela de Salud Pública, Universidad de Chile Santiago Chile Programa de Epidemiología, Escuela de Salud Pública, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
María Paz BertogliaUnidad de Nutrición de Poblaciones, Escuela de Salud Pública, Universidad de Chile Santiago Chile Unidad de Nutrición de Poblaciones, Escuela de Salud Pública, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Sergio MuñozPrograma de Políticas, Sistemas y Gestión en Salud, Escuela de Salud Pública, Universidad de Chile Santiago Chile Programa de Políticas, Sistemas y Gestión en Salud, Escuela de Salud Pública, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Cristóbal CuadradoDepartamento de Salud Pública-CIGES, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera Temuco Chile Departamento de Salud Pública-CIGES, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCompare the diagnostic properties of five case definitions of suspected COVID-19 that were used or proposed in Chile during the first eight months of the pandemic.

methodsAn analysis was done of the diagnostic properties (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values) of three case definitions of suspected COVID-19 used in Chile between March and October 2020, as well as two alternative proposed definitions. The sample was 2,019 people with known results for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2. Stepwise logistic regression was used to develop criterion 5, optimizing sensitivity and specificity values. Multifactor logistic regression was used to explore the association between demographic variables, symptoms and signs, and PCR positivity. Different positivity scenarios were analyzed and ROC curves were compared.

resultsThe presence of anosmia (OR = 8.00; CI95%: 5.34-11.99), fever (OR = 2.15; CI95%: 1.28-3.59), and having been in close contact with a person sick with COVID-19 (OR = 2.89; CI95%: 2.16-3.87) were associated with a positive PCR result. According to the analysis of the ROC curve, criterion 5 had the highest capacity for discrimination, although there were no significant differences with the other four criteria.

conclusionsCriterion 5-based on anosmia, close contact with people with COVID-19, and fever as sufficient unique elements-was the most sensitive in identifying suspected cases of COVID-19, a key aspect in controlling the spread of the pandemic.

Indexed as

ChileCoronavirus infectionsmolecular diagnostic techniquesSARS virus

Identifiers

PMID33643397
PMCPMC7905736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.