ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021
Comparison of Gene Editing Versus Conventional Breeding to Introgress the
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Horn Traits on Yanhuang Cattle: Association with Production Performance and Genetic Characterization of Candidate Polled Alleles.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study and Whole-Genome Resequencing Reveal Key lincRNA and Candidate Gene for Polled Phenotype in Yak.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Opportunities and computational challenges in large-scale whole-genome sequencing data analysis.Journal of animal science · 2026Review
- Welfare of beef cattle.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Genetic advancements and future directions in ruminant livestock breeding: from reference genomes to multiomics innovations.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Review
- Genetic diversity, tissue-specific expression, and functional analysis of theFrontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Review
- Cytoplasmic Injection of Zygotes to Genome Edit Naturally Occurring Sequence Variants Into Bovine Embryos.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- A variance component estimation approach to infer associations between Mendelian polledness and quantitative production and female fertility traits in German Simmental cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Comparison of Genetic Merit for Weight and Meat Traits between the Polled and Horned Cattle in Multiple Beef Breeds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dehorning is the process of physically removing horns to protect animals and humans from injury, but the process is costly, unpleasant, and faces increasing public scrutiny. Genetic selection for polled (hornless), which is genetically dominant to horned, is a long-term solution to eliminate the need for dehorning. However, due to the limited number of polled Australian Brahman bulls, the northern Australian beef cattle population remains predominantly horned. The potential to use gene editing to produce high-genetic-merit polled cattle was recently demonstrated. To further explore the concept, this study simulated introgression of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.