Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33643335›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Genetic Architecture and Genomic Prediction of Cooking Time in Common Bean (

Santiago Diaz, Daniel Ariza-Suarez, Raisa Ramdeen, Johan Aparicio, Nirmala Arunachalam, Carlos Hernandez, Harold Diaz, Henry Ruiz, Hans-Peter Piepho, Bodo Raatz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Tools and Techniques to Accelerate Crop Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Santiago DiazBean Program, Agrobiodiversity Area, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Daniel Ariza-SuarezBean Program, Agrobiodiversity Area, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Raisa RamdeenInstitute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Hohenheim, Germany.
Johan AparicioBean Program, Agrobiodiversity Area, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Nirmala ArunachalamBean Program, Agrobiodiversity Area, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Carlos HernandezInstituto Tecnológico de Durango, Victoria de Durango, Mexico.
Harold DiazBean Program, Agrobiodiversity Area, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Henry RuizBean Program, Agrobiodiversity Area, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Hans-Peter PiephoInstitute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Hohenheim, Germany.
Bodo RaatzBean Program, Agrobiodiversity Area, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooking time of the common bean is an important trait for consumer preference, with implications for nutrition, health, and environment. For efficient germplasm improvement, breeders need more information on the genetics to identify fast cooking sources with good agronomic properties and molecular breeding tools. In this study, we investigated a broad genetic variation among tropical germplasm from both Andean and Mesoamerican genepools. Four populations were evaluated for cooking time (CKT), water absorption capacity (WAC), and seed weight (SdW): a bi-parental RIL population (DxG), an eight-parental Mesoamerican MAGIC population, an Andean (VEF), and a Mesoamerican (MIP) breeding line panel. A total of 922 lines were evaluated in this study. Significant genetic variation was found in all populations with high heritabilities, ranging from 0.64 to 0.89 for CKT. CKT was related to the color of the seed coat, with the white colored seeds being the ones that cooked the fastest. Marker trait associations were investigated by QTL analysis and GWAS, resulting in the identification of 10 QTL. In populations with Andean germplasm, an inverse correlation of CKT and WAC, and also a QTL on Pv03 that inversely controls CKT and WAC (CKT3.2/WAC3.1) were observed. WAC7.1 was found in both Mesoamerican populations. QTL only explained a small part of the variance, and phenotypic distributions support a more quantitative mode of inheritance. For this reason, we evaluated how genomic prediction (GP) models can capture the genetic variation. GP accuracies for CKT varied, ranging from good results for the MAGIC population (0.55) to lower accuracies in the MIP panel (0.22). The phenotypic characterization of parental material will allow for the cooking time trait to be implemented in the active germplasm improvement programs. Molecular breeding tools can be developed to employ marker-assisted selection or genomic selection, which looks to be a promising tool in some populations to increase the efficiency of breeding activities.

Indexed as

beancookinggenome-wide association mapping (GWAS)predictionQTL

Identifiers

PMID33643335
PMCPMC7905357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.