Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33643279›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2020

Challenges and Clinical Strategies of CAR T-Cell Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Overview and Developments.

Xinjie Xu, Shengkang Huang, Xinyi Xiao, Qihang Sun, Xiaoqian Liang, Sifei Chen, Zijing Zhao, Zhaochang Huo, Sanfang Tu, Yuhua Li

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Nanoparticle-Based Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy for Cancer Immunotherapy.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xinjie XuDepartment of Hematology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shengkang HuangDepartment of Hematology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xinyi XiaoDepartment of Hematology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qihang SunDepartment of Hematology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoqian LiangDepartment of Hematology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Sifei ChenDepartment of Hematology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zijing ZhaoDepartment of Hematology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhaochang HuoDepartment of Hematology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Sanfang TuDepartment of Hematology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuhua LiDepartment of Hematology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Southern Medical University · CNZhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy exhibits desirable and robust efficacy in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Stimulated by the revolutionized progress in the use of FDA-approved CD19 CAR T cells, novel agents with CAR designs and targets are being produced in pursuit of superior performance. However, on the path from bench to bedside, new challenges emerge. Accessibility is considered the initial barrier to the transformation of this patient-specific product into a commercially available product. To ensure infusion safety, profound comprehension of adverse events and proactive intervention are required. Additionally, resistance and relapse are the most critical and intractable issues in CAR T-cell therapy for ALL, thus precluding its further development. Understanding the limitations through up-to-date insights and characterizing multiple strategies will be critical to leverage CAR T-cell therapy flexibly for use in clinical situations. Herein, we provide an overview of the application of CAR T-cell therapy in ALL, emphasizing the main challenges and potential clinical strategies in an effort to promote a standardized set of treatment paradigms for ALL.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmClinical Decision-MakingClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenRecurrenceRetreatmentT-LymphocytesTreatment OutcomeAntigens, NeoplasmReceptors, Chimeric Antigenaccessadverse eventsapplicationCAR T-cellchallengesclinical strategiesrelapseresistance

Identifiers

PMID33643279
PMCPMC7902522
OpenAlexW3128879876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.