ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021
The India Face Set: International and Cultural Boundaries Impact Face Impressions and Perceptions of Category Membership.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The preserved role of emotion prediction errors across adulthood.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026Article
- Behavioural separation of face memory and face perception.Nature communications · 2026Article
- The Apemen Faces Database (ApeFD).Scientific data · 2025Article
- FACEDIG automated tool for placing landmarks on facial portraits for geometric morphometrics users.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Israeli Face Database (IFD): A multi-ethnic database of faces with supporting social norming data.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Based Assessment of Lip Symmetry for Patients With Repaired Cleft Lip.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2025Article
- Toronto Ethnically Diverse face database: a multi-faceted stimulus set.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- FaceFinder: A machine learning tool for identification of facial images from heterogenous datasets.AJO international · 2024Article
- Stereotypes bias social class perception from faces: The roles of race, gender, affect, and attractiveness.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024Article
- The pictorial set of Emotional Social Interactive Scenarios between Chinese Adults (ESISCA): Development and validation.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Face templates for the Chicago Face Database.Behavior research methods · 2023Article
- Open-Source Periorbital Segmentation Dataset for Ophthalmic Applications.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper serves three specific goals. First, it reports the development of an Indian Asian face set, to serve as a free resource for psychological research. Second, it examines whether the use of pre-tested U.S.-specific norms for stimulus selection or weighting may introduce experimental confounds in studies involving non-U.S. face stimuli and/or non-U.S. participants. Specifically, it examines whether subjective impressions of the face stimuli are culturally dependent, and the extent to which these impressions reflect social stereotypes and ingroup favoritism. Third, the paper investigates whether differences in face familiarity impact accuracy in identifying face ethnicity. To this end, face images drawn from volunteers in India as well as a subset of Caucasian face images from the Chicago Face Database were presented to Indian and U.S. participants, and rated on a range of measures, such as perceived attractiveness, warmth, and social status. Results show significant differences in the overall valence of ratings of ingroup and outgroup faces. In addition, the impression ratings show minor differentiation along two basic stereotype dimensions, competence and trustworthiness, but not warmth. We also find participants to show significantly greater accuracy in correctly identifying the ethnicity of ingroup faces, relative to outgroup faces. This effect is found to be mediated by ingroup-outgroup differences in perceived group typicality of the target faces. Implications for research on intergroup relations in a cross-cultural context are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.