ArticleApplied soft computing2021
Expeditious COVID-19 similarity measure tool based on consolidated SCA algorithm with mutation and opposition operators.
Article in Applied soft computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A memorized multi-objective Sinh-Cosh optimizer for solving multi-objective engineering design problems.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Memory-based quadratic interpolation optimization with reinforcement learning for robust PV parameter estimation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced artificial satellite search algorithm with memory and evolutionary operator for PID controller parameter estimation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced hunger games search algorithm that incorporates the marine predator optimization algorithm for optimal extraction of parameters in PEM fuel cells.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm for Parameter Estimation of PID Controller.Arabian journal for science and engineering · 2023Article
- A comprehensive survey of sine cosine algorithm: variants and applications.Artificial intelligence review · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
COVID-19 is a global pandemic that aroused the interest of scientists to prevent it and design a drug for it. Nowadays, presenting intelligent biological data analysis tools at a low cost is important to analyze the biological structure of COVID-19. The global alignment algorithm is one of the important bioinformatics tools that measure the most accurate similarity between a pair of biological sequences. The huge time consumption of the standard global alignment algorithm is its main limitation especially for sequences with huge lengths. This work proposed a fast global alignment tool (G-Aligner) based on meta-heuristic algorithms that estimate similarity measurements near the exact ones at a reasonable time with low cost. The huge length of sequences leads G-Aligner based on standard Sine-Cosine optimization algorithm (SCA) to trap in local minima. Therefore, an improved version of SCA was presented in this work that is based on integration with PSO. Besides, mutation and opposition operators are applied to enhance the exploration capability and avoiding trapping in local minima. The performance of the improved SCA algorithm (SP-MO) was evaluated on a set of IEEE CEC functions. Besides, G-Aligner based on the SP-MO algorithm was tested to measure the similarity of real biological sequence. It was used also to measure the similarity of the COVID-19 virus with the other 13 viruses to validate its performance. The tests concluded that the SP-MO algorithm has superiority over the relevant studies in the literature and produce the highest average similarity measurements 75% of the exact one.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.