Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33642813›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2021

A retrospective study of

Michail Yur'iyevich Shchelkanov, Tatyana Vladimirovna Tabakaeva, Pavel Vasilevich Fomenko, Ekaterina Michailovna Kim, Anton Vadimovich Tabakaev, Irina Vyacheslavovna Galkina

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michail Yur'iyevich ShchelkanovFar Eastern Federal University, School of Biomedicine, Vladivostok, Russia.
Tatyana Vladimirovna TabakaevaFar Eastern Federal University, School of Biomedicine, Vladivostok, Russia.
Pavel Vasilevich FomenkoAmur Branch of Russian Department of World Wide Fund, Verkhneportovaya, 18A, Vladivostok, Primorsky Krai, Russia.
Ekaterina Michailovna KimFar Eastern Federal University, School of Biomedicine, Vladivostok, Russia.
Anton Vadimovich TabakaevFar Eastern Federal University, School of Biomedicine, Vladivostok, Russia.
Irina Vyacheslavovna GalkinaFar Eastern Federal University, School of Biomedicine, Vladivostok, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimMATERIALS AND

methodsFecal samples were analyzed by means of a standardized flotation method using a saturated salt solution containing NaNO

resultsThe highest prevalence rates were found among young adult dogs (8.3%), followed by puppies (5.4%); the lowest prevalence rates were found in dogs older than 3 years (4.3%). The prevalence was 5.8% among female dogs and 7.2% in male dogs. Coinfections with roundworms and protozoan parasites were frequently observed in

conclusionThe present study showed that male dogs and young dogs were most susceptible to

Indexed as

canine hookwormdogsinfectionUncinaria stenocephala

Identifiers

PMID33642813
PMCPMC7896900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.