ArticleJournal of cleaner production2021
Towards understanding the effect of cedar roof covering application on firebrand production in large outdoor fires.
Article in Journal of cleaner production, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the increased concern for the environment, sustainable construction materials are getting increased attention. Wood is considered a renewable, sustainable construction material. The problem with wood is that it is a fire-prone material. With an increasing number of wildland-urban interface (WUI) fires recently, it is important to consider that wood buildings are in danger to be ignited as well as may produce new sources of ignition due to firebrand production. Experiments were performed to investigate cedar roof covering effects of firebrand production from roof assemblies. Two wind speeds, 6 m/s and 8 m/s were selected for this experiment for a comparison with literature. The wood materials used were untreated cedar shingles, untreated cedar shakes, fire retardant cedar shingles and fire retardant cedar shakes. The roof assembly with fire retardant cedar shakes applied produced little or no firebrands under both wind speeds tested. Roof coverings fitted with cedar siding produced more variety of firebrands compared to only base sheathing materials. The mass and the projected area of firebrands were found to have a linear relationship. The firebrand coefficient was used for comparison. With attendant increase in wind speed, the firebrand coefficient increased in this study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.