ArticleThe Ulster medical journal2021
The Challenge of Cancer Pain Assessment.
Article in The Ulster medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer pain.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Advancing Postoperative Pain Management in Oral Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Persistence of pain and suffering in cancer patients: challenges of pain management from the perspective of nurses.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Health Care Provider Attitudes and Beliefs Toward Nonmedical Opioid Use in Patients with Cancer Pain.Journal of palliative medicine · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Automatic Pain Assessment: Research Methods and Perspectives.Pain research & management · 2023Review
- Validation and Application of the Chinese Version of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory in Breast Cancer Patients.Current medical science · 2022Article
- Barriers to cancer pain management from the perspective of patients: A qualitative study.Nursing open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33642634PMC7907907What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.