ReviewThe Ulster medical journal2021
The Operative Incidence of Syndactyly in Northern Ireland. A 10-Year Review.
Review in The Ulster medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Patient-Centered Outcomes After Congenital Syndactyly Reconstruction: Aesthetic, Functional, and Psychosocial Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Epidemiology of congenital polydactyly and syndactyly in Hunan Province, China.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- A Complex Case of Clino-Syndactyly with Fourth Metacarpal Aplasia.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSyndactyly is a common congenital condition that can present sporadically or in relation to an underlying genetic condition. Little contemporary published data exists detailing specific rates of presentation and surgical intervention, especially in Western European population. This is the first published review of operative intervention rates for the condition over time in Northern Ireland.
methodsA ten-year retrospective review of electronic operative records from January 2007 - October 2017 was carried out within Northern Ireland's regional tertiary centre Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children (RBHSC). All congenital hand surgery in the country was performed here during the period reviewed, by a single surgeon. Patient age at surgical intervention, their sex, digits involved and clinical grade of syndactyly was recorded.
resultsOne hundred and twenty four cases were returned following the review. On individual analysis 22 cases were excluded as they were not primary congenital syndactyly. The remaining 102 cases were all Caucasian. Six cases were toe syndactyly while 96 cases involved the upper limb digits. The group consisted of 70 males and 32 female infants. Age range at time of surgical intervention was 8 months to 14 years with a median age of 26 months. For clinical grade of upper limb syndactyly; 35 cases in the data set were classed as simple incomplete, 34 cases as simple complete, 17 as complex and 5 cases as complicated syndactyly. The remaining 5 cases lacked clear documentation. The most common site of syndactyly was between the ring and middle finger (40/102). Annual frequency of operative intervention has trended upwards in the period studied.
conclusionThis case review adds epidemiological data on the operative incidence of syndactyly cases in Northern Ireland - a relatively isolated genetic population. Overall rates of incidence have increased over the past 10 years. It remains unclear if this is due to new environmental influences on the developing population or increased referral for surgical intervention over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33642625PMC7907904W3134275051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.