ReviewMacromolecules2021
Using High Molecular Precision to Study Enzymatically Induced Disassembly of Polymeric Nanocarriers: Direct Enzymatic Activation or Equilibrium-Based Degradation?
Review in Macromolecules, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing bacterial power and omics technologies for sustainable plastic waste biodegradation.Biodegradation · 2026Review
- Unimer Exchange as a Tool for Programming Enzymatic Degradation through Micellar Dynamics.Biomacromolecules · 2025Article
- Programmable Fabrics of Enzyme-Responsive Amphiphiles: A Multiscale Platform for Hierarchical Mesophase Transformations.Biomacromolecules · 2025Article
- Structural Determinants of Stimuli-Responsiveness in Amphiphilic Macromolecular Nano-assemblies.Progress in polymer science · 2024Article
- Architecture-Based Programming of Polymeric Micelles to Undergo Sequential Mesophase Transitions.ACS macro letters · 2023Article
- Stimuli-Induced Architectural Transition as a Tool for Controlling the Enzymatic Degradability of Polymeric Micelles.ACS polymers Au · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enzyme-responsive polymers and their assemblies offer great potential to serve as key materials for the design of drug delivery systems and other biomedical applications. However, the utilization of enzymes to trigger the disassembly of polymeric amphiphiles, such as micelles, also suffers from the limited accessibility of the enzyme to moieties that are hidden inside the assembled structures. In this Perspective, we will discuss examples for the utilization of high molecular precision that dendritic structures offer to study the enzymatic degradation of polymeric amphiphiles with high resolution. Up to date, several different amphiphilic systems based on dendritic blocks have all shown that small changes in the hydrophobicity and amphiphilicity strongly affected the degree and rate of enzymatic degradation. The ability to observe the huge effects due to relatively small variations in the molecular structure of polymers can explain the limited enzymatic degradation that is often observed for many reported polymeric assemblies. The observed trends imply that the enzymes cannot reach the hydrophobic core of the micelles, and instead, they gain access to the amphiphiles by the unimer-micelle equilibrium, making the unimer exchange rate a key parameter in tuning the enzymatic degradation rate. Several approaches that are aimed at overcoming the stability-responsiveness challenge are discussed as they open the way to the design of stable and yet enzymatically responsive polymeric nanocarriers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.