Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33642366›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2021

Alzheimer's disease: a tale of two diseases?

Eleonora Nardini, Ryan Hogan, Anthony Flamier, Gilbert Bernier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Simvastatin rescues cognitive impairment in an AβNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Acrolein Induces Retinal Abnormalities of Alzheimer's Disease in Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Myelin in Alzheimer's disease: culprit or bystander?Acta neuropathologica communications · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eleonora NardiniWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ryan HoganStem Cell and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Anthony FlamierWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Gilbert BernierStem Cell and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont; Department of Neurosciences, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sporadic late-onset Alzheimer's disease (SLOAD) and familial early-onset Alzheimer's disease (FEOAD) associated with dominant mutations in APP, PSEN1 and PSEN2, are thought to represent a spectrum of the same disorder based on near identical behavioral and histopathological features. Hence, FEOAD transgenic mouse models have been used in past decades as a surrogate to study SLOAD pathogenic mechanisms and as the gold standard to validate drugs used in clinical trials. Unfortunately, such research has yielded little output in terms of therapeutics targeting the disease's development and progression. In this short review, we interrogate the widely accepted view of one, dimorphic disease through the prism of the Bmi1

Indexed as

agingAlzheimer’s diseaseBMI1epigeneticsfamiliallate-onsetsporadic

Identifiers

PMID33642366
PMCPMC8343298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.