ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2021
Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy system using unmodified clinical laser fibers for tissue optical property recovery for photodynamic therapy treatment planning.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Quantitative model for imaging single fiber reflectance spectroscopy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
significanceWe recently developed a model for the reflectance measured with (multi-diameter) single-fiber reflectance (SFR) spectroscopy as a function of the reduced scattering coefficient μs', the absorption coefficient μa, and the phase function parameter psb. We validated this model with simulations.
aimWe validate our model experimentally. To prevent overfitting, we investigate the wavelength-dependence of psb and propose a parametrization with only three parameters. We also investigate whether this parametrization enables measurements with a single fiber, as opposed to multiple fibers used in multi-diameter SFR (MDSFR). APPROACH: We validate our model on 16 phantoms with two concentrations of Intralipid-20% (μs'=13 and 21 cm - 1 at 500 nm) and eight concentrations of Evans Blue (μa = 1 to 20 cm - 1 at 605 nm). We parametrize psb as 10 - 5 · ( p1 ( λ / 650 ) + p2(λ/650)2 + p3(λ/650)3 ) .
resultsAverage errors were 7% for μs', 11% for μa, and 16% with the parametrization of psb; and 7%, 17%, and 16%, respectively, without. The parametrization of psb improved the fit speed 25 times (94 s to <4 s). Average errors for only one fiber were 50%, 33%, and 186%, respectively.
conclusionsOur recently developed model provides accurate results for MDSFR measurements but not for a single fiber. The psb parametrization prevents overfitting and speeds up the fit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.