Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33641055›Full record

ReviewEndocrine pathology2021

Molecular Pathology of Well-Differentiated Pulmonary and Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumors: What Do Pathologists Need to Know?

Marco Volante, Ozgur Mete, Giuseppe Pelosi, Anja C Roden, Ernst Jan M Speel, Silvia Uccella

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Thymic neuroendocrine tumours: molecular landscape, immune microenvironment and therapeutic perspectives.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Atypical Carcinoid of the Thymus: Early Diagnosis in a Case Report.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Marco VolanteDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. marco.volante@unito.it.
Ozgur MeteDepartments of Pathology, University Healthy Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Giuseppe PelosiDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Anja C RodenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ernst Jan M SpeelDepartment of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Silvia UccellaDept. of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Maastricht University · NLMayo Clinic · USUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Insubria · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thoracic (pulmonary and thymic) neuroendocrine tumors are well-differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms that are classified into typical and atypical carcinoid tumors based on mitotic index cut offs and presence or absence of necrosis. This classification scheme is of great prognostic value but designed for surgical specimens, only. Deep molecular characterization of thoracic neuroendocrine tumors highlighted their difference with neuroendocrine carcinomas. Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung are characterized by a low mutational burden, and a high prevalence of mutations in chromatin remodeling and histone modification-related genes, whereas mutations in genes frequently altered in neuroendocrine carcinomas are rare. Molecular profiling divided thymic neuroendocrine tumors into three clusters with distinct clinical outcomes and characterized by a different average of copy number instability. Moreover, integrated histopathological, molecular and clinical evidence supports the existence of a grey zone category between neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoid tumors) and neuroendocrine carcinomas. Indeed, cases with well differentiated morphology but mitotic/Ki-67 indexes close to neuroendocrine carcinomas have been increasingly recognized. These are characterized by specific molecular profiles and have an aggressive clinical behavior. Finally, thoracic neuroendocrine tumors may arise in the background of genetic susceptibility, being MEN1 syndrome the well-defined familial form. However, pathologists should be aware of rarer germline variants that are associated with the concurrence of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung or their precursors (such as DIPNECH) with other neoplasms, including but not limited to breast carcinomas. Therefore, genetic counseling for all young patients with thoracic neuroendocrine neoplasia and/or any patient with pathological evidence of neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia-to-neoplasia progression sequence or multifocal disease should be considered.

Indexed as

PathologistsPathology, MolecularCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineHumansLung NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsThymus NeoplasmsCarcinoidDIPNECHGermline variantsLungMEN1MolecularNeuroendocrine tumorRAD5A1CThymus

Identifiers

PMID33641055
PMCPMC7960615
OpenAlexW3134545034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.