ReviewJournal of animal science2021
Understanding intake on pastures: how, why, and a way forward.
Review in Journal of animal science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Forage intake and digesta kinetics of lactating beef cattle differing in feed efficiency while grazing Idaho rangelands.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Dosing frequency, fecal sampling, and digestibility method influence titanium dioxide-based intake estimates in dairy heifers.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Rhythms, Patterns and Styles in the Jaw Movement Activity of Beef Cattle on Rangeland as Revealed by Acoustic Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Linking Animal Feed Formulation to Milk Quantity, Quality, and Animal Health Through Data-Driven Decision-Making.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Galyean Appreciation Club review: knowledge gaps in the nutrition of grazing beef cattle.Journal of animal science · 2025Review
- Dosing and fecal sample collection effects on the estimates of intake using n-alkanes as markers.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Use of animal performance and gas flux for estimating dry matter intake in growing steers.Translational animal science · 2025Article
- Integrating multiple precision livestock technologies to advance rangeland grazing management.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Methods and Visual Observations to Categorize Behavior of Grazing Cattle Using Accelerometer Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Beef Steers and Enteric Methane: Reducing Emissions by Managing Forage Diet Fiber Content.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Grassland-based ruminant farming systems in China: Potential, challenges and a way forward.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An assessment of dietary intake is a critical component of animal nutrition. Consumption of feed resources is the basis upon which feeding strategies and grazing management are based. Yet, as far back as 1948, researchers have lauded the trials and tribulations of estimation of the phenomenon, especially when focused on grazing animals and pasture resources. The grazing environment presents a unique situation in which the feed resource is not provided to the animal but, rather, the animal operates as the mechanism of harvest. Therefore, tools for estimation must be developed, validated, and applied to the scenario. There are a plethora of methods currently in use for the estimation of intake, ranging from manual measurement of herbage disappearance to digital technologies and sensors, each of which come with its share of advantages and disadvantages. In order to more firmly grasp these concepts and provide a discussion on the future of this estimation, the Forages and Pastures Symposium at the 2020 ASAS-CSAS-WSASAS Annual Meeting was dedicated to this topic. This review summarizes the presentations in that symposium and offers further insight into where we have come from and where we are going in the estimation of intake for grazing livestock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.