Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33640523›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2021

Optimized tumour infiltrating lymphocyte assessment for triple negative breast cancer prognostics.

Maschenka Ca Balkenhol, Francesco Ciompi, Żaneta Świderska-Chadaj, Rob van de Loo, Milad Intezar, Irene Otte-Höller, Daan Geijs, Johannes Lotz, Nick Weiss, Thomas de Bel and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Maschenka Ca BalkenholRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: maschenka.balkenhol@radboudumc.nl.
Francesco CiompiRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Żaneta Świderska-ChadajRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Warsaw, Poland.
Rob van de LooRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Milad IntezarRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Irene Otte-HöllerRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Daan GeijsRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Johannes LotzFraunhofer Institute for Image Computing MEVIS, Lübeck, Germany.
Nick WeissFraunhofer Institute for Image Computing MEVIS, Lübeck, Germany.
Thomas de BelRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Geert LitjensRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Peter BultRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jeroen Awm van der LaakRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine · DELinköping University · SEWarsaw University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumour microenvironment has been shown to be a valuable source of prognostic information for different cancer types. This holds in particular for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), a breast cancer subtype for which currently no prognostic biomarkers are established. Although different methods to assess tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been published, it remains unclear which method (marker, region) yields the most optimal prognostic information. In addition, to date, no objective TILs assessment methods are available. For this proof of concept study, a subset of our previously described TNBC cohort (n = 94) was stained for CD3, CD8 and FOXP3 using multiplex immunohistochemistry and subsequently imaged by a multispectral imaging system. Advanced whole-slide image analysis algorithms, including convolutional neural networks (CNN) were used to register unmixed multispectral images and corresponding H&E sections, to segment the different tissue compartments (tumour, stroma) and to detect all individual positive lymphocytes. Densities of positive lymphocytes were analysed in different regions within the tumour and its neighbouring environment and correlated to relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). We found that for all TILs markers the presence of a high density of positive cells correlated with an improved survival. None of the TILs markers was superior to the others. The results of TILs assessment in the various regions did not show marked differences between each other. The negative correlation between TILs and survival in our cohort are in line with previous studies. Our results provide directions for optimizing TILs assessment methodology.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNetherlandsBiomarkers, TumorArtificial intelligenceMultispectral imagingPrognosisTriple negative breast cancerTumour infiltrating lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID33640523
PMCPMC7933536
OpenAlexW3132682314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.