Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33640146›Full record

ArticleVaccine2021

Improving adolescent human papillomavirus (HPV) immunization uptake in school-based health centers through awareness campaigns.

Madhura S Rane, Libby C Page, Emma McVeigh, Kaetlin Miller, David Baure, M Elizabeth Halloran, Jeffrey S Duchin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Madhura S RaneDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: mrane@uw.edu.
Libby C PagePublic Health, Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA, USA.
Emma McVeighPublic Health, Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kaetlin MillerPublic Health, Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA, USA.
David BaurePublic Health, Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA, USA.
M Elizabeth HalloranDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jeffrey S DuchinPublic Health, Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Methods for Evaluating Vaccine EfficacyR37AI032042 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HALLORAN, M ELIZABETH · 2010 to 2019
$5.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI032042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to measure the effect of a multicomponent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine promotion campaign on adolescent HPV vaccine uptake at school-based health centers (SBHCs) in Seattle, WA.

methodsYouth-led HPV vaccine promotion campaigns were introduced in 2016 in 13 schools with SBHCs in Seattle. Five other schools with SBHCs served as controls. Vaccination records for students were obtained from the Washington Immunization Information System from September 2012 to August 2018. We compared increase in HPV vaccine uptake in SBHCs between 1) intervention and control schools, and 2) pre- and post-intervention periods in intervention schools using generalized estimating equations.

resultsHPV vaccine uptake was high at baseline among students that use SBHCs for vaccines and has steadily increased between 2012 and 2018. Implementing the promotion campaign resulted in 14% higher (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1%, 30%) HPV vaccine uptake in intervention SBHCs compared to control SBHCs, adjusting for time and confounders. Comparing pre-and post-intervention periods in intervention SBHCs, HPV vaccine uptake was 14% higher (95% CI: -4%, 35%) in the post-intervention period. SBHCs that received more active intervention activities saw 9% higher (95% CI: 1%, 21%) vaccine uptake compared to those that received passive intervention.

conclusionThe vaccination promotion program implemented in a school-based setting resulted in higher HPV vaccine uptake in the post-intervention period compared to pre-intervention period, but this increase was not statistically significant. Even so, schools that received more intervention activities for longer periods of time had higher HPV vaccine uptake.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesAdolescentHumansImmunizationImmunization ProgramsPatient Acceptance of Health CareSchoolsVaccinationWashingtonPapillomavirus VaccinesAdolescentsHuman papillomavirusHuman papillomavirus vaccineImmunization registrySchool-based health centers

Identifiers

PMID33640146
PMCPMC8021275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.