Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33639917›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2021

'Menstruation means impurity': multilevel interventions are needed to break the menstrual taboo in Nepal.

Subash Thapa, Arja R Aro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring the Feasibility of a Social Media Intervention for Nepali Menstruators.Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Contextualisation of the safeTALK™ Suicide Prevention Program: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Menstrual Exile: Nepal's Chhaupadi and the Policy-Practice Divide.International journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Traditional Beliefs, Practices, and Migration: A Risk to Malaria Transmission in Rural Nepal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Subash ThapaResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. sthapa@health.sdu.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-1182-8511
Arja R AroUnit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring their menstrual period, women are generally considered impure in Nepal; in the rural areas of the western part of the country, they are even banished to stay in sheds (called chhaupadi) during this time, which increases their vulnerability to a variety of health consequences. There is lack of clarity regarding the effectiveness of interventions that have been implemented to address menstrual taboo and improve menstrual hygiene and practices in Nepal (e.g., public awareness, community sensitization and legislation). In this paper, we discuss why menstruation management interventions, particularly those implemented to change the menstrual taboo might not work, and the opinions and experiences regarding the implementation of such interventions. MAIN TEXT: Anecdotal reports from the field and empirical studies suggest that interventions to address menstrual taboos have only been effective for short durations of time due to several reasons. First, local community stakeholders have been reluctant to take actions to abandon retrogressive menstrual practices in rural areas. Second, women who have stopped practising chhaupadi have faced stigma (e.g., fear of exclusion) and discrimination (e.g., blaming, physical and verbal abuse). Third, contextual factors, such as poverty and illiteracy, limit the effectiveness of such interventions. Fourth, community sensitization activities against chhaupadi have faced resistance from community leaders and traditional healers. Fifth, the law prohibiting chhaupadi has also faced implementation problems, including poor filing of complaints.

conclusionMultilevel, multisectoral interventions could be more effective than single-component interventions in breaking the prevailing menstrual taboo and in improving menstrual health and hygiene practices among young girls and women in the rural areas of Nepal. Moreover, interventions that have an active community mobilization component could be effective within local contexts and cultural groups.

Indexed as

MenstruationTabooFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansHygieneNepalCommunity mobilizationMenstrual health interventionsMenstrual stigmaMenstrual tabooMenstruation management interventionsMultilevel interventionsNepalWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID33639917
PMCPMC7971149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.