Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33639864›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2021

Neonatal sepsis in a tertiary unit in South Africa.

Dharshni Pillay, Lerusha Naidoo, Khine Swe Swe-Han, Yesholata Mahabeer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Carbapenem-resistantMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dharshni PillayDepartment of Medical Microbiology, National Health Laboratory Service, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, 800 Vusi Mzimela Road, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4091, South Africa. dharshnipillay@gmail.com.
Lerusha NaidooNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, 800 Vusi Mzimela Road, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4091, South Africa.
Khine Swe Swe-HanDepartment of Medical Microbiology, National Health Laboratory Service, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, 800 Vusi Mzimela Road, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4091, South Africa.
Yesholata MahabeerDepartment of Medical Microbiology, National Health Laboratory Service, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, 800 Vusi Mzimela Road, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4091, South Africa.
National Health Laboratory Service · ZAUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a global threat to healthcare resulting in an increase in morbidity and mortality. Neonatal sepsis is ranked as the third highest cause of neonatal demise globally, in which AMR accounted for 31.0% of deaths. AMR in neonates has been poorly characterised in Durban, South Africa. Thus, the resultant effect of AMR on empiric regimens for neonatal sepsis is uncertain in this setting. Therefore, this study analysed the aetiology and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bloodstream infections within the neonatal intensive care unit at a tertiary hospital in Durban, with the aim of establishing an effective empiric regimen for the unit.

methodsA retrospective data review on positive blood cultures from the neonatal intensive care unit at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital was conducted. Three time periods were analysed: 2014, 2016 and 2018. Culture data from neonates aged 0-30 days were included and repeat cultures were de-duplicated. The frequency of common organisms and their antimicrobial susceptibilities were analysed. Fischer's exact test was used for subgroup analysis. Poisson and logistic regressions were used to assess significant trends in organisms and antimicrobial susceptibilities over time.

resultsLate-onset sepsis (86.8%) predominated over early-onset sepsis (13.2%). A preponderance of gram-positive organisms (68.7%) over gram-negatives (26.8%) and fungi (4.5%) was detected. Common pathogens included coagulase-negative staphylococci (53.5%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.6%), enterococci (9.3%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (7.7%). Despite the small contribution of fungi to the microbial profile, fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis predominated within that group. High rates of resistance to first- and second-line antibiotics were also noted among gram-positive and gram-negative organisms. Multidrug resistant organisms included extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) K. pneumoniae (7.6%) and extensively-drug resistant A. baumannii (7.0%). However, a statistically significant decrease in ESBL-producing organisms was documented during the entire study period (p = 0.005).

conclusionsIt was determined that first-line antimicrobials, advocated by the World Health Organization for treatment of neonatal sepsis, proved ineffective in this unit due to high levels of AMR. Therefore, this study advises that meropenem with or without vancomycin provides optimal empiric cover. Amphotericin B is advocated for empiric antifungal therapy. Ongoing surveillance is necessary.

Indexed as

Neonatal SepsisAge of OnsetAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Typing TechniquesFemaleHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycological Typing TechniquesRetrospective StudiesSouth AfricaTertiary Care CentersAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial resistanceEmpiric regimensMicrobial profilesNeonatal sepsis

Identifiers

PMID33639864
PMCPMC7912533
OpenAlexW3134527503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.