Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33639778›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2021

Shear wave speeds in nearly-incompressible fibrous materials with two fiber families.

Zuoxian Hou, Philip V Bayly, Ruth J Okamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zuoxian HouDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Philip V BaylyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Ruth J OkamotoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.

Funding

High-Resolution, Anisotropic MR Elastography of the BrainR01EB027577 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI BAYLY, PHILIP V, JOHNSON, CURTIS L · 2019 to 2022
$2.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An analytical and numerical investigation of shear wave behavior in nearly-incompressible soft materials with two fiber families was performed, focusing on the effects of material parameters and imposed pre-deformations on wave speed. This theoretical study is motivated by the emerging ability to image shear waves in soft biological tissues by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). In MRE, the relationships between wave behavior and mechanical properties can be used to characterize tissue properties non-invasively. We demonstrate these principles in two material models, each with two fiber families. One model is a nearly-incompressible linear elastic model that exhibits both shear and tensile anisotropy; the other is a two-fiber-family version of the widely-used Holzapfel-Gasser-Ogden (HGO) model, which is nonlinear. Shear waves can be used to probe nonlinear material behavior using infinitesimal dynamic deformations superimposed on larger, quasi-static "pre-deformations." In this study, closed-form expressions for shear wave speeds in the HGO model are obtained in terms of the model parameters and imposed pre-deformations. Analytical expressions for wave speeds are confirmed by finite element simulations of shear waves with various polarizations and propagation directions. These studies support the feasibility of estimating the parameters of an HGO material model noninvasively from measured shear wave speeds.

Identifiers

PMID33639778
PMCPMC7878018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.