ArticleClinical drug investigation2021
Phase 1b Evaluation of Abaloparatide Solid Microstructured Transdermal System (Abaloparatide-sMTS) in Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mineral Density.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04366726 (A Prospective, Single Arm Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Usability of Abaloparatide-sMTS in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Single Arm Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Usability of Abaloparatide-sMTS in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is abaloparatide more efficacious on increasing bone mineral density than teriparatide for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis? An updated meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Pooled it
- A Qualitative Study to Assess US Patient Preferences between new Transdermal System and Injectable Anabolic Therapies for Osteoporosis Treatment.Archives of osteoporosis · 2022Pooled it
- Polymer Microneedles for Localized Drug Delivery in Musculoskeletal Tissue Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- The Efficacy and Safety of Abaloparatide in Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- [Osteo-anabolic treatment strategies].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- The application prospect of microneedles for sports injuries: a narrative review.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- A Review on the Mechanisms, Applications, and Clinical Trials of Advanced Technologies in the Transdermal Drug Delivery System.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025Review
- Recent advances in the identification of related factors and preventive strategies of hip fracture.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Effects of alendronate sodium combined with InterTan on osteoporotic femoral intertrochanteric fractures and fracture recurrence.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveAbaloparatide, an anabolic osteoporosis treatment administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection, increases bone mineral density (BMD) and reduces fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The abaloparatide-solid Microstructured Transdermal System [abaloparatide-sMTS (Kindeva, St Paul, MN, USA)], which delivers abaloparatide intradermally, is in development to provide an alternative method for abaloparatide delivery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of subjects to self-administer abaloparatide-sMTS, based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic markers.
methodsIn this single-arm, open-label, Phase 1b study, 22 healthy postmenopausal women aged 50-85 years with low BMD were trained to self-administer abaloparatide-sMTS 300 μg once daily to the thigh for 5 min for 29 days. The primary endpoint was systemic exposure to abaloparatide. Secondary endpoints included percent change from baseline in serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (s-PINP), patient experience, and safety.
resultsAll 22 subjects completed the study. At baseline, mean age was 65.2 years, mean total hip T-score was - 1.32, and mean lumbar spine T-score was - 1.98. On Day 1, the median time to reach maximum concentration (T
conclusionsSubjects successfully self-administered abaloparatide-sMTS, which provided a consistent pharmacokinetic profile over 29 days and produced s-PINP increases from baseline similar to that observed in the pivotal trial with abaloparatide-SC. Observed patient experience along with the clinical data support continued clinical development of abaloparatide-sMTS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04366726, Date of registration 04/29/2020, retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.