Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33638722›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

Return to sport and daily life activities after vertebral body tethering for AIS: analysis of the sport activity questionnaire.

Alice Baroncini, Per David Trobisch, Angelika Berrer, Philipp Kobbe, Markus Tingart, Jörg Eschweiler, Stephanie Da Paz, Filippo Migliorini

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05347056 (The Effect of Vertebral Body Tethering on Lumbar Paraspinal Muscle Cross-Section Area, Lumbar Range of Motion and Trunk Muscle Strength in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05347056 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Vertebral Body Tethering on Lumbar Paraspinal Muscle Cross-Section Area, Lumbar Range of Motion and Trunk Muscle Strength in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

TypeobservationalSponsorIstanbul UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled16ConditionsIdiopathic ScoliosisArmsLumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance, Isokinetic trunk flexion-extension trunk muscle strength and endurance test, Lomber Region Range of motion assessment, Radiograph, SRS 22
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sagittal alignment outcomes following two-row vertebral body tethering versus posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter two-year study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The use of electronic conductivity devices can effectively reduce radiation exposure in vertebral body tethering.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  14. The timing of tether breakage influences clinical results after VBT.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The effects of vertebral body tethering on sagittal parameters: evaluations from a 2-years follow-up.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  18. Difference between radiographically suspected and intraoperatively confirmed tether breakages after vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  19. Preliminary outcomes after vertebral body tethering (VBT) for lumbar curves and subanalysis of a 1- versus 2-tether construct.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alice BaronciniDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany. alice.baroncini@artemed.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4383-3470
Per David TrobischDepartment of Spine Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany.
Angelika BerrerDepartment of Spine Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany.
Philipp KobbeDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany.
Markus TingartDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany.
Jörg EschweilerDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany.
Stephanie Da PazDepartment of Spine Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany.
Filippo MiglioriniDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVertebral body tethering (VBT) is an alternative to fusion for selected scoliosis patients. As VBT does not limit spine mobility, it has been propagated that this technique allows a quicker return to physical activity than fusion. However, no data are available to support this statement. Aim of this study was to quantify how much time patients required to resume preoperative activity level and to seek possible associations between return to physical activity and demographic, radiographic and surgical data.

methodsOne year postoperatively, the validated sport activity questionnaire (SAQ) was administered to all skeletally immature patients who underwent VBT at our institution. SAQ data were analyzed and a multivariate analysis was conducted to investigate associations between SAQ and demographic, radiographic and surgical data.

resultsThirty-one patients aged 14.5 years completed the SAQ. Within 3 months from VBT, 97% returned to school, 61% resumed physical education, 97% carried a backpack, 68% run, and 82% rode a bike; 70% bent within a month from VBT. Ninety-four percent of patients returned to their preoperative athletic level. Within 3 months, 63% of responders resumed noncontact, 61% contact and 53% collision sports. No relevant associations were observed between the SAQ and demographic, radiographic and surgical data. In particular, number of instrumented vertebrae, level of the lowest instrumented vertebra and postoperative Cobb angle did not influence patients' return to preoperative activities.

conclusionVBT allows patients to quickly return to their preoperative activity level, irrespectively of the postoperative Cobb angle or type of instrumentation.

Indexed as

ScoliosisSpinal FusionSportsFollow-Up StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesReturn to SportSurveys and QuestionnairesThoracic VertebraeTreatment OutcomeVertebral BodyAdolescent idiopathic scoliosisFusionless anterior scoliosis correctionPatient reported outcome measuresPhysical activitySportSport activity questionnaireVertebral body tethering

Identifiers

PMID33638722
PMCPMC7912966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.