ArticleNursing open2021
Nurses' Experiences and Perceptions of two Early Warning Score systems to Identify Patient Deterioration-A Focus Group Study.
Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Critical Points of Risk in Registered Nurses' Use of a National Early Warning Score-Perceptions and Challenges.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- When Nurses Worry: A Concept Analysis of Intuition in Clinical Deterioration.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Review
- Unplanned transfers from wards to intensive care units: how well does NEWS identify patients in need of urgent escalation of care?Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Variation in nurses' compliance with an Early Warning Score protocol: A retrospective cohort study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- When caring becomes an art - how clinical gaze are perceived to be developed.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023Article
- Engaging Multidisciplinary Clinical Users in the Design of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Graphical User Interface for Intensive Care Unit Instability Decision Support.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- How nurses use National Early Warning Score and Individual Early Warning Score to support their patient risk assessment practice: A fieldwork study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2023Article
- Nurses' Experiences and Perceptions of two Early Warning Score systems to Identify Patient Deterioration-A Focus Group Study.Nursing open · 2021Article
- Nurses' and Physicians' Ideas on Initiatives for Effective Use of the Early Warning Score: A Participatory Study.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo explore Registered Nurses' experiences and perceptions with National Early Warning Score and Individual Early Warning Score to identify patient deterioration.
designA qualitative exploratory design.
methodsSix focus groups were conducted at six Danish hospitals from February to June 2019. Registered Nurses from both medical, surgical and emergency departments participated. The focus groups were analysed using content analysis.
resultsOne theme and four categories were identified. Theme: Meaningful in identifying patient deterioration but causing frustration due to lack of flexibility. Categories: (a) Inter-professional collaboration strengthened through the use of Early Warning Score systems, (b) Enhanced professional development and communication among nurses when using Early Warning Score systems, (c) Detecting patient deterioration by integrating nurses' clinical gaze with Early Warning Score systems and (d) Modification and fear of making mistakes when using Early Warning Score systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.