Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33638281›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2021

Wheat with greatly reduced accumulation of free asparagine in the grain, produced by CRISPR/Cas9 editing of asparagine synthetase gene TaASN2.

Sarah Raffan, Caroline Sparks, Alison Huttly, Lucy Hyde, Damiano Martignago, Andrew Mead, Steven J Hanley, Paul A Wilkinson, Gary Barker, Keith J Edwards and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing and Its Applications in Cereal Crop Improvement.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Asparagine Synthetase GenePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah RaffanDepartment of Plant Sciences, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.
Caroline SparksDepartment of Plant Sciences, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.
Alison HuttlyDepartment of Plant Sciences, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.
Lucy HydeDepartment of Plant Sciences, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.
Damiano MartignagoDepartment of Plant Sciences, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.
Andrew MeadDepartment of Computational and Analytical Sciences, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.
Steven J HanleyDepartment of Computational and Analytical Sciences, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.
Paul A WilkinsonFunctional Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Gary BarkerFunctional Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Keith J EdwardsFunctional Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Tanya Y CurtisCurtis Analytics Limited, Rothamsted Research Campus, Harpenden, UK.
Sarah UsherCurtis Analytics Limited, Rothamsted Research Campus, Harpenden, UK.
Ondrej KosikCurtis Analytics Limited, Rothamsted Research Campus, Harpenden, UK.
Nigel G HalfordDepartment of Plant Sciences, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6488-2530
Rothamsted Research · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E000126/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E01268X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F010370/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council EGA17701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free asparagine is the precursor for acrylamide, which forms during the baking, toasting and high-temperature processing of foods made from wheat. In this study, CRISPR/Cas9 was used to knock out the asparagine synthetase gene, TaASN2, of wheat (Triticum aestivum) cv. Cadenza. A 4-gRNA polycistronic gene was introduced into wheat embryos by particle bombardment and plants were regenerated. T1 plants derived from 11 of 14 T0 plants were shown to carry edits. Most edits were deletions (up to 173 base pairs), but there were also some single base pair insertions and substitutions. Editing continued beyond the T1 generation. Free asparagine concentrations in the grain of plants carrying edits in all six TaASN2 alleles (both alleles in each genome) were substantially reduced compared with wildtype, with one plant showing a more than 90 % reduction in the T2 seeds. A plant containing edits only in the A genome alleles showed a smaller reduction in free asparagine concentration in the grain, but the concentration was still lower than in wildtype. Free asparagine concentration in the edited plants was also reduced as a proportion of the free amino acid pool. Free asparagine concentration in the T3 seeds remained substantially lower in the edited lines than wildtype, although it was higher than in the T2 seeds, possibly due to stress. In contrast, the concentrations of free glutamine, glutamate and aspartate were all higher in the edited lines than wildtype. Low asparagine seeds showed poor germination but this could be overcome by exogenous application of asparagine.

Indexed as

Aspartate-Ammonia LigaseTriticumAsparagineCRISPR-Cas SystemsEdible GrainGene EditingAsparagineAspartate-Ammonia Ligaseacrylamideamino acidsasparagineasparagine synthetaseCRISPR/Cas9food safetygenome editinggrain compositionwheat

Identifiers

PMID33638281
PMCPMC8384593
OpenAlexW3130004700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.