Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33638241›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021

QSM reconstruction challenge 2.0: A realistic in silico head phantom for MRI data simulation and evaluation of susceptibility mapping procedures.

José P Marques, Jakob Meineke, Carlos Milovic, Berkin Bilgic, Kwok-Shing Chan, Renaud Hedouin, Wietske van der Zwaag, Christian Langkammer, Ferdinand Schweser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mapping a reproducible water fraction and TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Region Expansion of Background Field Removal with Local Spherical Harmonics Approximation for Whole-brain Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Toward a realistic in silico abdominal phantom for QSM.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

José P MarquesDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8157-8864
Jakob MeinekePhilips Research, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8663-1468
Carlos MilovicDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-1196-6703
Berkin BilgicAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9080-7865
Kwok-Shing ChanDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8427-169X
Renaud HedouinDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4341-9907
Wietske van der ZwaagSpinoza Center for Neuroimaging, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3223-9721
Christian LangkammerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7097-9707
Ferdinand SchweserBuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0399-9211

Funding

University of Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute - Supplement SchulyerUL1TR001412 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MURPHY, TIMOTHY F · 2015 to 2024
$33.8M
Cancer Research UK 24348NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo create a realistic in silico head phantom for the second QSM reconstruction challenge and for future evaluations of processing algorithms for QSM.

methodsWe created a digital whole-head tissue property phantom by segmenting and postprocessing high-resolution (0.64 mm isotropic), multiparametric MRI data acquired at 7 T from a healthy volunteer. We simulated the steady-state magnetization at 7 T using a Bloch simulator and mimicked a Cartesian sampling scheme through Fourier-based processing. Computer code for generating the phantom and performing the MR simulation was designed to facilitate flexible modifications of the phantom in the future, such as the inclusion of pathologies as well as the simulation of a wide range of acquisition protocols. Specifically, the following parameters and effects were implemented: TR and TE, voxel size, background fields, and RF phase biases. Diffusion-weighted imaging phantom data are provided, allowing future investigations of tissue-microstructure effects in phase and QSM algorithms.

resultsThe brain part of the phantom featured realistic morphology with spatial variations in relaxation and susceptibility values similar to the in vivo setting. We demonstrated some of the phantom's properties, including the possibility of generating phase data with nonlinear evolution over TE due to partial-volume effects or complex distributions of frequency shifts within the voxel.

conclusionThe presented phantom and computer programs are publicly available and may serve as a ground truth in future assessments of the faithfulness of quantitative susceptibility reconstruction algorithms.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsBrainComputer SimulationHeadHumansPhantoms, Imagingin silico head phantomMRI simulationsquantitative susceptibility mapping

Identifiers

PMID33638241
PMCPMC8048665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.