ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2021
HFOV vs CMV for neonates with moderate-to-severe perinatal onset acute respiratory distress syndrome (NARDS): a propensity score analysis.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-Frequency Oscillation vs Mechanical Ventilation for Neonatal Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- The Effects of HFOV-VG vs HFOV on Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia and Neurobehavioral Development in Preterm Infants with Perinatal Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- The impact of early high-frequency ventilation uses in Brazilian preterm infants: an initiative to improve healthcare.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2025Article
- Elective HFOV vs CMV as Early Intervention: A Clinical Trial in Neonates with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Advanced biomedical research · 2025Article
- Endotracheal Surfactant and Budesonide Combination Therapy in Neonatal Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome due to Late-Onset Sepsis.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2024Observational
- Comparison of High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilators.Respiratory care · 2024Article
- Comparison of the Montreux definition with the Berlin definition for neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome.European journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- The perinatal period should be considered in neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome: comparison of the Montreux definition vs. the second pediatric acute lung injury consensus conference definition.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Respiratory support strategies in the prevention and treatment of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
- Risk factors for air leakage during invasive mechanical ventilation in pediatric intensive care units.European journal of medical research · 2022Article
- Dynamic Monitoring of Serum Protein in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Based on Artificial Neural Network.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Safety and efficacy of a novel double-lumen tracheal tube in neonates with RDS: A prospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate whether high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) could reduce mortality and the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) of perinatal-onset neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (NARDS) compared with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). Medical records were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Among the 700 neonates with NARDS who needed invasive ventilation, 501 (71.6%) received CMV, while 199 (28.4%) received HFOV. One-to-one propensity score matching (127:127) was used to match the baseline characteristics of patients who received CMV and HFOV. The results showed that birth weight and oxygenation index (OI) were independently associated with mortality in the multivariate logistic regression. No significant differences were observed in mortality or the incidence of BPD between the two groups. The incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and ventilation-free days were significantly lower in the HFOV group than in the CMV group (3.9 vs 11.80%, p=0.02; 15.226 vs 20.967 days, p=0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding other secondary outcomes.Conclusion: HFOV was associated with a decreased incidence of IVH in infants with NARDS compared with CMV. However, there were significantly more VFDs in the CMV group than in the HFOV group, and HFOV did not appear to be superior to CMV in decreasing the mortality and incidence of BPD in infants with NARDS. What is Known: • The diagnostic criteria of neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (Montreux criteria) were established in 2017. • To date, studies comparing high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome are insufficient. What is New: • High-frequency oscillatory ventilation did not appear to be superior to conventional mechanical ventilation in decreasing the mortality and incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants with moderate-to-severe perinatal-onset neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome. • High-frequency oscillatory ventilation was associated with a decreased incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage in infants with moderate-to-severe perinatal-onset acute respiratory distress syndrome compared with conventional mechanical ventilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.