Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33638051›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2021

A comparative study of dentinal tubule penetration and the retreatability of EndoSequence BC Sealer HiFlow, iRoot SP, and AH Plus with different obturation techniques.

Ruiqi Yang, Jun Tian, Xiangya Huang, Shuxiang Lei, Yanling Cai, Zhezhen Xu, Xi Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Comparison of apical sealing ability of three bioceramic root canal sealersHua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ruiqi YangDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology Sun Yat-sen University, 56 Ling Yuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510055, Guangdong, China.
Jun TianDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology Sun Yat-sen University, 56 Ling Yuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510055, Guangdong, China.
Xiangya HuangDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology Sun Yat-sen University, 56 Ling Yuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510055, Guangdong, China.
Shuxiang LeiDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology Sun Yat-sen University, 56 Ling Yuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510055, Guangdong, China.
Yanling CaiDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology Sun Yat-sen University, 56 Ling Yuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510055, Guangdong, China.
Zhezhen XuDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology Sun Yat-sen University, 56 Ling Yuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510055, Guangdong, China.
Xi WeiDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology Sun Yat-sen University, 56 Ling Yuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510055, Guangdong, China. weixi@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5749-2910

Funding

Guangdong Financial Fund for High-Caliber Hospital Construction 174-2018-XMZC-0001-03-0125/D-08Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation 2017A030308011National Natural Science Foundation of China 81970925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate dentinal tubule penetration and the retreatability of EndoSequence BC Sealer HiFlow (HiFlow), iRoot SP, and AH Plus when using the single-cone (SC) or continuous wave condensation (CWC) technique. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty-five single-rooted teeth were instrumented and randomly divided into 5 groups: group 1, AH Plus/CWC; group 2, iRoot SP/CWC; group 3, iRoot SP/SC; group 4, HiFlow/CWC; and group 5, HiFlow/SC. The ability to re-establish patency during endodontic retreatment was recorded, as was the time taken to reach the working length. Dentinal tubule penetration and remaining debris after retreatment were evaluated by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparisons test (α = 0.05).

resultsThe HiFlow/CWC and iRoot SP/CWC groups required more time to reach the working length than groups that underwent the SC technique regardless of the sealer used (P < .05). The HiFlow/CWC group showed a significantly higher percentage of sealer penetration area than that of the iRoot SP/SC at 4 mm from the apex (P < .05) and penetrated deeper into dentinal tubules than iRoot SP/SC at both 8-mm and 12-mm levels (P < .05). Moreover, the HiFlow/CWC and HiFlow/SC groups demonstrated less remaining sealer along the canal wall than AH Plus/CWC group at 4-mm level (P < .05).

conclusionsHiFlow/CWC technique showed better performance in dentinal tubule penetration than that of iRoot SP/SC. Both HiFlow and iRoot SP combined with CWC technique groups required more retreatment time than the other groups. Furthermore, using HiFlow with either the CWC or SC technique left less remaining sealer at 4-mm level than using AH Plus with the CWC technique during retreatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: With favorable performance in dentinal tubule penetration and retreatability in endodontic retreatment, the combined use of EndoSequence BC Sealer HiFlow with the recommended continuous wave condensation technique may be a worthwhile choice in root canal treatment.

Indexed as

Root Canal Filling MaterialsEpoxy ResinsRoot Canal ObturationSilicatesepoxy resin-based root canal sealerEpoxy ResinsiRoot SPRoot Canal Filling MaterialsSilicatesBC Sealer HiFlowDentinal tubule penetrationiRoot SPObturation techniqueRetreatability

Identifiers

PMID33638051
PMCPMC8137581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.