Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33638050›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2021

Genetic ataxias: update on classification and diagnostic approaches.

Natalie Witek, Jacob Hawkins, Deborah Hall

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ataxia in Africa: current efforts and recommendations.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Patients' Perspective in Hereditary Ataxia.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Italian cross-cultural adaptation of the patient-reported outcome measure of ataxia.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalie WitekRush Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Program, 1725 W Harrison St. Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. Natalie_P_Witek@rush.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3947-9066
Jacob HawkinsRush Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Program, 1725 W Harrison St. Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Deborah HallRush Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Program, 1725 W Harrison St. Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Rush University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ataxia encompasses a large group of rare disorders characterized by irregular movements, decreased coordination, imbalance, kinetic tremor, wide-based stance, and dysarthria. Evaluating ataxia can be challenging considering the volume of disorders and their complex pathologies involving diverse genetic and clinical factors. This is a comprehensive review of the genetic ataxia literature, presenting updated guidelines for differential diagnosis. Age, time course, and family history provide initial guidance for evaluation of ataxia. As genetic testing is increasingly utilized, new genes are discovered and phenotypes for existing disorders are expanded. This review assists physicians by offering a diagnostic roadmap for suspected hereditary ataxia based on the current literature.

Indexed as

Cerebellar AtaxiaSpinocerebellar DegenerationsAtaxiaGenetic TestingHumansPhenotypeAtaxiaAutosomal dominant ataxiaAutosomal recessive ataxiaHereditary ataxiaSporadic ataxia

Identifiers

PMID33638050
OpenAlexW3130673846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.